Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add aaddrick/gh-cli-search/plugin install gh-cli-searchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaddrick/gh-cli-search/testing-gh-skills)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaddrick/gh-cli-search/testing-gh-skills"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aaddrick/gh-cli-search/testing-gh-skills.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.02817 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01409 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00563 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00282 |
Grade A, and why
testing-gh-skills scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 337 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testing GitHub CLI Search Skills
⚠️ CRITICAL: Slash Command Only
This skill should NEVER be invoked automatically.
ONLY invoke this skill when:
- User explicitly runs
/test-gh-skillsslash command - User explicitly requests "run the test suite"
DO NOT invoke when:
- User asks about testing in general
- User asks how to test
- User mentions the word "test" in any context
- You think testing would be helpful
- ANY other scenario
Why: Running the full test suite takes ~8 minutes and 80 Claude API calls. This is expensive and should only happen on explicit user request via the slash command.
Overview
Execute comprehensive test suite for all gh CLI search skills using a Python test orchestrator. The script runs 80 tests in parallel (default: 4 workers), validates responses, and generates detailed reports at multiple levels. After test execution completes, the test-reviewer agent automatically analyzes results and creates REVIEWER-NOTES.md.
Core Principle: Fast, efficient test execution with minimal overhead. Each test runs in a fresh Claude session with only the user request (no test criteria leaked).
Performance: ~6 seconds per test, ~2-3 minutes total for 80 tests with parallel execution (4 workers).
When to Use
ONLY use this skill when user explicitly invokes:
/test-gh-skillsslash command- Direct request: "run the full test suite"
- Direct request: "execute all tests"
NEVER use automatically for:
- Testing a single command manually (use
./testing/scripts/run-single-test.shdirectly) - Skills haven't been created yet
- Need to write new test scenarios first
- User asks about testing concepts
- User mentions testing in passing
Architecture
python3 testing/scripts/run-all-tests.py [--workers N] [--no-review]
├─> Parse all scenario files in testing/scenarios/
├─> For each test group (6 groups total):
│ ├─> Submit tests to parallel worker pool (default: 4 workers)
│ ├─> Each worker executes: ./testing/scripts/run-single-test.sh "<user-request>"
│ │ └─> claude -p "<user-request>" --allowedTools "Read,Skill"
│ ├─> Extract command from response
│ ├─> Validate against expected criteria
│ └─> Write test report
├─> Generate group reports (per scenario file)
├─> Generate master report (all tests)
└─> Automatically invoke test-reviewer agent (headless)
├─> Read master report
├─> Analyze group reports
├─> Sample individual test failures (3-5 examples)
├─> Identify failure patterns
├─> Perform root cause analysis
└─> Create REVIEWER-NOTES.md with recommendations
Total: 80 tests across 6 groups (parallel execution with 4 workers) + automatic review
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 337 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 93489a4249c8
testing-gh-skills is a skill published in the GitHub repository aaddrick/gh-cli-search (8 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 2,817 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.