Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/aaronbassett/agent-foundry/code-reviewnpx skills add aaronbassett/agent-foundry --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aaronbassett/agent-foundryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaronbassett/agent-foundry/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaronbassett/agent-foundry/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aaronbassett/agent-foundry/code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00078 | $0.00512 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00256 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00102 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
devs:code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review — Method
The review method for producing evidence-based, severity-ranked findings. A finding that hasn't been checked against the actual code is a guess, not a finding.
This skill deliberately ships no analysis scripts: a reviewer that can read the diff, search the codebase, and run the project's own toolchain outperforms any metric-generating script — run the project's real commands instead.
Reference routing
| Reference | Use when |
|---|---|
| diff-scoping.md | Getting the right change-set, reading order, blast radius, scope discipline |
| review-method.md | The evidence bar per finding class; converting suspicion into verified finding |
| severity-taxonomy.md | Blocking/Important/Minor tiers and the evidence each requires |
Delegation
- Security findings — the
devs:security-coreskill (its review-lens reference is the weighted security checklist). - Language-idiom findings — the matching language skill defines idiomatic:
devs:rust-core,devs:python-core,devs:typescript-core,devs:react-core(+devs:react-componentsfor component house style). Load the skill for each language in the diff. - Dependency findings (new packages in the diff, lockfile changes) — the
devs:deps-coreskill.
The method in one paragraph
Scope the exact change-set and read it in dependency order. Judge every hunk in its real context — the whole function, its callers, the data it touches. For each candidate finding, attempt refutation against the code (guards, types, existing tests), verify by execution where cheap, and file only what survives — at the severity its verified impact supports, with file:line and a concrete failure scenario. Run the project's own gauntlet (its lint/typecheck/test commands, not a guessed list) and never flag what the project's tooling already enforces or explicitly disables.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 29 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A b39d0dddc8ee
devs:code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository aaronbassett/agent-foundry (4 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 512 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…