.NET Skills is an AI coding plugin that provides skills and specialized guidance for professional .NET development, covering areas such as C#, Akka.NET, Aspire, Entity Framework Core, testing, and performance. .NET developers use it with coding assistants to apply production-oriented patterns while building and maintaining applications. The catalogue contains the plugin’s skills, agents, and instructions.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill efcore-patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills/efcore-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills/efcore-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills/efcore-patterns/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills/efcore-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills/efcore-patterns.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 163 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- high Memory Poisoning · line 411 Skill manipulates agent memory, state, or stored context. Memory corruption can alter personality, override safety rules, or cause unpredictable behavior.Fix: Protect agent memory and state from modification by untrusted content. Use read-only memory for critical instructions and validate all state changes.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.03884 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.01554 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00777 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00388 |
Grade A, and why
efcore-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- efcore-patterns — 100% identical, 3 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 630 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Entity Framework Core Patterns
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Setting up EF Core in a new project
- Optimizing query performance
- Managing database migrations
- Integrating EF Core with .NET Aspire
- Debugging change tracking issues
- Loading multiple navigation collections efficiently (query splitting)
Core Principles
- NoTracking by Default - Most queries are read-only; opt-in to tracking
- Never Edit Migrations Manually - Always use CLI commands
- Dedicated Migration Service - Separate migration execution from application startup
- ExecutionStrategy for Retries - Handle transient database failures
- Explicit Updates - When NoTracking, explicitly mark entities for update
Pattern 1: NoTracking by Default
Configure your DbContext to disable change tracking by default. This improves performance for read-heavy workloads.
public class ApplicationDbContext : DbContext
{
public ApplicationDbContext(DbContextOptions<ApplicationDbContext> options)
: base(options)
{
// Disable change tracking by default for better performance on read-only queries
// Use .AsTracking() explicitly for queries that need to track changes
ChangeTracker.QueryTrackingBehavior = QueryTrackingBehavior.NoTracking;
}
public DbSet<Order> Orders => Set<Order>();
public DbSet<Customer> Customers => Set<Customer>();
}
When NoTracking is Active
Read-only queries work normally:
// ✅ Fast read - no tracking overhead
var orders = await dbContext.Orders
.Where(o => o.Status == OrderStatus.Pending)
.ToListAsync();
Writes require explicit handling:
// ❌ WRONG - Entity not tracked, SaveChanges does nothing
var order = await dbContext.Orders.FirstOrDefaultAsync(o => o.Id == orderId);
order.Status = OrderStatus.Shipped;
await dbContext.SaveChangesAsync(); // Nothing happens!
// ✅ CORRECT - Explicitly mark entity for update
var order = await dbContext.Orders.FirstOrDefaultAsync(o => o.Id == orderId);
order.Status = OrderStatus.Shipped;
dbContext.Orders.Update(order); // Marks entire entity as modified
await dbContext.SaveChangesAsync();
// ✅ ALSO CORRECT - Use AsTracking() for the query
var order = await dbContext.Orders
.AsTracking()
.FirstOrDefaultAsync(o => o.Id == orderId);
order.Status = OrderStatus.Shipped;
await dbContext.SaveChangesAsync(); // Works!
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago Changed 1386317a0674
- 1mo ago First seen · 630 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 908a5e366c02
efcore-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills (1,235 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 3,884 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
optimizing-ef-core-queries
Review and optimize application data access that uses Entity Framework Core (EF Core). Use for EF Core performance and correctness reviews of services, repositories, imports, and background jobs: slow or memory-heavy queries, excessive round-trips, hidden SaveChanges, premature materialization, dynamic query…
azure-resource-manager-postgresql-dotnet
Azure PostgreSQL Flexible Server SDK for .NET. Database management for PostgreSQL Flexible Server deployments. Use for creating servers, databases, firewall rules, configurations, backups, and high availability. Triggers: "PostgreSQL", "PostgreSqlFlexibleServer", "PostgreSQL Flexible Server", "Azure Database for…
entity-framework-core
Design, tune, or review EF Core data access with proper modeling, migrations, query translation, performance, and lifetime management for modern .NET applications. USE FOR: DbContext, migrations, model configuration, EF queries, tracking, loading, performance, transactions, and EF6 migration decisions. DO NOT USE FOR…
entity-framework6
Maintain or migrate EF6-based applications with realistic guidance on what to keep, what to modernize, and when EF Core is or is not the right next step. USE FOR: EF6 codebases; runtime versus ORM migration decisions; EDMX, code-first, ObjectContext, and legacy data-access review. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks…
neo4j-driver-dotnet-skill
Neo4j .NET Driver v6 — IDriver lifecycle, DI registration (singleton), ExecutableQuery fluent API, ExecuteReadAsync/ExecuteWriteAsync managed transactions, IResultCursor (FetchAsync/ ToListAsync), record value access (.Get /As ), null safety, UNWIND batching, temporal types, await using, EagerResult, object mapping…
sod
Use when needing a multi-paradigm .NET ORM with SQL-MAP (MyBatis-style XML mapping), OQL (Object Query Language), and traditional ORM. PDF.NET SOD: combines ORM + SQL-MAP + OQL for flexible .NET data access.