Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AbdurRafay2004/handoff --skill designgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AbdurRafay2004/handoffWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/abdurrafay2004/handoff/design)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/abdurrafay2004/handoff/design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/abdurrafay2004/handoff/design/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/abdurrafay2004/handoff/design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/abdurrafay2004/handoff/design.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.01343 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00537 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00269 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Design
Part of the Plan/Build phases — see the workflow skill for tiers and sequencing.
Design deep modules: a lot of behaviour behind a small interface, placed at a clean seam, testable through that interface. The aim is leverage for callers, locality for maintainers, and testability for everyone. Mostly T2/T3 territory.
Glossary
Use these terms exactly — consistent language is the whole point.
Module — anything with an interface and an implementation. Deliberately scale-agnostic: a function, class, package, or tier-spanning slice. Avoid: unit, component, service.
Interface — everything a caller must know to use the module correctly: the type signature, but also invariants, ordering constraints, error modes, required configuration, performance characteristics. Avoid: API, signature (too narrow — type-level surface only).
Implementation — what's inside a module. Distinct from Adapter: a thing can be a small adapter with a large implementation (a Postgres repo) or a large adapter with a small implementation (an in-memory fake).
Depth — leverage at the interface: how much behaviour a caller (or test) can exercise per unit of interface they must learn. Deep = lots of behaviour behind a small interface; shallow = interface nearly as complex as the implementation.
Seam (Michael Feathers) — a place where you can alter behaviour without editing in that place; where a module's interface lives. Where to put the seam is its own design decision, distinct from what goes behind it. Avoid: boundary (overloaded with DDD's bounded context).
Adapter — a concrete thing satisfying an interface at a seam. Describes role, not substance.
Leverage — what callers get from depth: one implementation pays back across N call sites and M tests.
Locality — what maintainers get from depth: change, bugs, knowledge, and verification concentrate in one place. Fix once, fixed everywhere.
Deep vs shallow
Deep (aim for this): Shallow (avoid):
┌───────────────┐ ┌───────────────────────────────┐
│ Small interface│ │ Large interface │
├───────────────┤ ├───────────────────────────────┤
│ │ │ Thin implementation │
│ Deep implemen- │ └───────────────────────────────┘
│ tation │
└───────────────┘
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 137 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A a17869dee69a
design is a skill published in the GitHub repository AbdurRafay2004/handoff (4 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,343 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
frontend
Two-mode frontend skill: (1) authoring — accessibility, responsive layout, loading/error states, performance, DESIGN.md authoring, visual direction; (2) critique — READ-only scored review of built UI against anchored rubric, AI-slop detection, two isolated assessments. Router invokes mode via context.
html-demo
A workflow for building a self-contained interactive HTML demo from a screenshot and a short requirement. The demo imitates the interface and includes simulated controls so its states can be explored.
visual
Define a brand's visual identity — logo usage rules and variations, a color palette with contrast ratios, typography and type scale, and photography, illustration and icon style. Use when the user needs to settle their brand colors, fonts, logo rules or imagery style, or formalize the visual assets they already have.
form-cro
Optimize a web form for completion — cut fields, choose single or multi-step, fix labels, validation, button copy and trust signals. Use when people start a lead, contact, demo or checkout form but abandon it before submitting. Not for the whole signup-to-trial journey; see /marketing:signup-flow-cro.
design-review
Create a Figma Slides deck summarizing a component's design journey — research, contract, options, prototype and test results — with title and summary slides. Use when the user needs to present a component's design work to stakeholders or walk a team through it. Not for feedback on a design; see /coaching:ux or…
a11y-audit
Audit a Figma component or frame for accessibility in one pass — design lint, contrast, color-blindness simulation, focus order — with fixes. Use when the user points at a Figma design and wants a quick accessibility check before it goes to development. Not for a full WCAG-EM audit of a built site or app, or mentoring…