design-review

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent

npx skills add bromso/metapowers --skill design-review

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bromso/metapowers

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bromso/metapowers/design-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bromso/metapowers/design-review)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bromso/metapowers/design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bromso/metapowers/design-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bromso/metapowers/design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bromso/metapowers/design-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 73 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.

When invoked 645 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.

Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00073	$0.00645
Opus 5.5	$0.00029	$0.00258
Sonnet 5.5	$0.00015	$0.00129
Haiku 4.5	$0.00007	$0.00064

Measured today against content hash dd16861e5888, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

design-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/design/skills/design-review/SKILL.md · 49 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 49 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Design Review

Generate a Figma Slides presentation that summarizes the design journey for "$ARGUMENTS" — covering research, definition, ideation, prototyping, and testing.

Arguments. $ARGUMENTS may contain the project name and optional flags. Take the first token as <project> and treat --skip-checks as a flag; never include flags in file paths. All paths below use <project>. If --skip-checks is present, skip the prerequisite check and, before writing any artifact, append one line to .metapowers/design/<project>/skip-log.md: - <ISO timestamp> — <skill name> skipped prerequisite check for <artifact file> — reason: <reason or "none given">.

Prerequisites

At least the Define phase (.metapowers/design/<project>/02-define.md) should exist. More phases provide a richer presentation.

Process

Read all available phase artifacts:
- .metapowers/design/<project>/01-empathize.md (research brief)
- .metapowers/design/<project>/02-define.md (component contract)
- .metapowers/design/<project>/03-ideate.md (design options)
- .metapowers/design/<project>/04-prototype.md (prototype notes)
- .metapowers/design/<project>/05-test.md (test report)
Create a title slide:
- Call figma_create_slide with name " — Design Review"
- Call figma_add_text_to_slide with the component name as the title
- Call figma_add_text_to_slide with the date as a subtitle
Create a slide for each completed phase:
- For each phase artifact that exists, create a slide summarizing the key findings
- Call figma_add_text_to_slide for headings and key points
- If the prototype exists, call figma_export_image to capture the component and mention it in the slide
Create a summary slide:
- Overall status (pass/fail from test report if available)
- Key decisions made during the process
- Next steps or open items
Set slide transitions:
- Call figma_set_slide_transition with "DISSOLVE" for each slide

Read the full file on GitHub · 49 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

today First seen · 49 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A dd16861e5888

Subscribe to this mod's changes

design-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository bromso/metapowers (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 645 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-21.

Claude Code Code review Design and UX Testing claude-agent claude-code-plugin claude-skills context-design context-engineering

codex-ab

Run an A/B codex review experiment — holistic codex review vs 3 focused dimension passes (security, ecto, liveview) on the branch diff, classify findings, report a panel-value verdict. Use when the branch is fresh, before any codex review runs.

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix · 60 tokens

codex-loop

Fix Elixir/Phoenix code until Codex CLI review comes back clean — bounded review, fix, verify loop before opening a PR. Use when codex is installed and you want an external cross-model critic on your changes before pushing.

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix · 52 tokens

spike-consumer-adversarial

OI-3 spike harness — heavy consumer, ADVERSARIAL arm. Worst-case early-exit test: the mid-workflow Skill call has no continuation guardrail and the guidance skill ends with a final-sounding anchor. Use only when explicitly invoked by the spike harness with a TRIALID and data path.

testdouble/han · 0 tokens