Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ace3000chao/book2startup --skill f31git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ace3000chao/book2startupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ace3000chao/book2startup/f31)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ace3000chao/book2startup/f31"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ace3000chao/book2startup/f31/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ace3000chao/book2startup/f31"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ace3000chao/book2startup/f31.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00135 | $0.02038 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00068 | $0.01019 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00408 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00204 |
Grade A, and why
f31-progressive-self-cultivation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 142 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
循序三修框架
R — 原文 (Reading)
"德随量进，量由识长，故欲厚其德，不可不弘其量，欲弘其量，不可不大其识。"
— 洪应明, 量弘识高 功德日进
I — 方法论骨架 (Interpretation)
这是自我修养的递进路径框架，核心洞察是：品德不能直接修，要通过"先增见识、再阔气量、最后厚德"的迂回路径来达成。
三层递进结构：
-
识（见识）：先要增广见识——见多识广，才能知道世界有多大、自己有多小。见识少的人，气量必然狭窄。
-
量（气度）：见识广了，气量自然变大——因为见过不同的活法，就不会再为小事斤斤计较。气量是见识的自然结果。
-
德（品德）：气量大了，品德自然厚了——一个有见识、有气量的人，不需要刻意"修德"，自然会有德。
核心误区：大多数人想"直接修德"（从0到德），但没有见识和气量支撑的"德"，是脆弱的、表面的、表演性的。正确的路径是：识 → 量 → 德。
A1 — 书中的应用 (Past Application)
案例 1: 大禹治水——见识先行
- 问题: 大禹之前，鲧用"堵"的方法治水失败了
- 方法论的使用: 大禹通过实地考察（增广见识），发现水宜疏不宜堵——这就是"识"，是后来一切的基础
- 结论: 没有见识，就没有正确的判断；没有正确的判断，再努力也是徒劳
- 结果: 治水成功，建立夏朝
案例 2: 姜子牙的超级见识
- 问题: 姜子牙拥有极高的才能，但始终没有施展的机会
- 方法论的使用: 他没有因此放弃或抱怨，而是用等待的时间继续增广见识和研究——直到见识到了足以支撑大业的程度
- 结论: 见识够了，气量自然大，机会自然来
- 结果: 佐周灭纣，成就大业
案例 3: 刘邦vs项羽的气量对比
- 问题: 刘邦出身低微，项羽出身贵族，为什么刘邦最终得了天下？
- 方法论的使用: 项羽"见识"虽高（兵法世家），但气量小（不能容人）；刘邦见识不如项羽，但气量大（能容人用人）——从气量对比看，刘邦胜
- 结论: 项羽的直接"修德"（恢复贵族秩序）是空洞的；刘邦的"容人雅量"是见识和气量结合的结果
- 结果: 汉朝建立，刘邦成开国皇帝
A2 — 触发场景 (Future Trigger) ★
用户会在什么情境下需要这个 skill?
- 自我反省但找不到入口：觉得自己"格局不够/气量太小/修养不足"，想要改善但不知从哪下手
- 直接"修德"失败：尝试过各种方法修身养性，但总是坚持不下来或没有效果
- 想帮助他人成长：作为管理者/导师，想知道如何帮助下属或学生提升
- 评估自己处于哪个阶段：不确定自己是"见识不够"还是"气量不够"还是"品德不够"
语言信号 (用户的话里出现这些就应激活)
- "我想提高自己的修养"
- "怎么才能有更大的格局"
- "我觉得自己气量太小了"
- "要怎样才能厚德"
- "我知道我应该大度，但我做不到"
- "道理我都懂，但还是……"（识→量的转化出了问题）
- "读了很多书，但还是过不好"（识有了但量不够）
- "我的问题到底在哪里"（需要诊断框架）
与相邻 skill 的区分
- 与
f17 量弘识高德行递进框架（f31的姐妹框架，同一段原文的不同角度解读）的区别：f17强调"识→量→德"的递进逻辑，本框架强调"不要直接修德，要从根源入手" - 与
f08 推己及人对治换位框架的区别：f08是具体的换位操作，本框架是宏观的修养路径诊断
E — 可执行步骤 (Execution)
当 skill 被激活后, agent 应按以下步骤执行:
-
诊断当前阶段
- 完成标准: 用户回答三个问题，确定自己处于哪一阶段： a. "我见过的世界够大吗？"（如果视野狭窄，则处于"识"阶段） b. "我能容纳不同意见吗？"（如果不能，则处于"量"阶段） c. "我自然而然有德吗？"（如果不自然，则处于"德"阶段）
-
针对阶段设定行动
- 完成标准: 若是"识"阶段 → 制定"见识扩张计划"（旅行/读书/见人/换环境）；若是"量"阶段 → 制定"气量训练计划"（主动接受不同意见/学会延迟反应）；若是"德"阶段 → 则无需刻意修德，保持自然
- 判停条件: 若用户存在基本的人格障碍（自恋型/反社会型），此框架不适用，需要专业干预
-
设定递进里程碑
- 完成标准: 用户写出三个月后的目标：具体是"见识多了什么"或"气量大了什么"，而不是抽象的"我要更有修养"
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 142 lines · 135 tokens per session scan A fe29cb6191f9
f31-progressive-self-cultivation is a skill published in the GitHub repository ace3000chao/book2startup (80 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 135 tokens to every session and 2,038 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
error-analysis-protocol
Design an error analysis protocol to diagnose the root cause of student mistakes and misconceptions. Use when error patterns appear in student work and targeted feedback is needed.
hr-onboarding
A new-hire onboarding plan as a single page — first week schedule, buddy + manager intro, learning track, equipment checklist, and "you're set when…" outcomes. Use when the brief mentions "onboarding", "new hire", "first week plan", or "入职".
book-mirror
Take any book (EPUB/PDF), produce a personalized chapter-by-chapter analysis. Each chapter is preserved in detail (The Chapter) and mirrored back to the reader's actual life (The Mirror) using brain context. The mirror observes and resonates — a friend pointing out parallels, NOT a consultant rearranging the reader's…
miniapp
Build a tiny interactive HTML playground only when someone asks to see, play with, or step through a mechanism.
eli5
Explain research, papers, or technical ideas in plain English with minimal jargon, concrete analogies, and clear takeaways. Use when the user says "ELI5 this", asks for a simple explanation of a paper or research result, wants jargon removed, or asks what something technically dense actually means.
deck-course-module
A course or workshop slide template with persistent learning goals, teaching pages, multiple-choice self-tests, and a wrap-up.