Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ace3000chao/book2startup --skill p10git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ace3000chao/book2startupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ace3000chao/book2startup/p10)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ace3000chao/book2startup/p10"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ace3000chao/book2startup/p10/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ace3000chao/book2startup/p10"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ace3000chao/book2startup/p10.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00095 | $0.01633 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00816 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00327 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00163 |
Grade A, and why
p10无过是功无怨是德 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
无过是功无怨是德原则
R — 原文 (Reading)
"处世不必邀功，无过便是功；与人不求感德，无怨便是德。"
— 洪应明, 《菜根谭·无过是功 无怨是德》
I — 方法论骨架 (Interpretation)
- 功不是"做出来了"，而是"没做错"。 洪应明认为，不邀功反而有功——因为不出错就是最大的功。
- 德不是"施恩了"，而是"没招怨"。 不求回报的施恩，如果最后没让人怨恨，就是最大的德。
- 邀功的人实际上在做什么？ 在把自己的价值绑定在别人的认可上——别人不认，就觉得自己没价值。
- 求感德的人实际上在做什么？ 在做一个隐形的交易——我给你恩，你欠我情；别人不感恩，就觉得被亏欠了。
- 核心：减少对外部评价的依赖。 无过=不邀功，无怨=不求德——两者都是在说：你的价值不需要别人来定义。
A1 — 书中的应用 (Past Application)
案例: 洪应明论"不邀功"的悖论
- 问题: 为什么做了很多事却得不到认可？要不要去"争取功劳"？
- 方法论的使用: 洪应明提出一个反直觉的观点：不要去邀功，因为"无过便是功"——不出错才是最大的功劳
- 结论: 邀功者往往因为"有所求"而显得动机不纯，反而得不到真心认可；不邀功者因为无所求而显得纯粹，反而赢得尊重
- 结果: 减少对外部认可的依赖，反而能更坦然地面对评价
A2 — 触发场景 (Future Trigger) ★
用户会在什么情境下需要这个 skill?
- 做了大量工作但得不到认可，纠结要不要"让领导知道"时 — "我做了这么多，为什么没人看到？"、"我要不要去争取一下功劳？"
- 付出后没有回报，感到心理不平衡时 — "我对他这么好，他怎么这样对我？"、"我帮了这么多，为什么没人感激？"
- 在"默默做事"和"适度表现"之间纠结时 — "我该不该让自己的付出被看到？"、"太老实是不是会吃亏？"
语言信号 (用户的话里出现这些就应激活)
- "我做了这么多没人看到"
- "凭什么功劳是别人的？"
- "我这么辛苦为什么没人心疼"
- "我帮了他，他怎么这样对我？"
- "我要不要让他们知道我做了什么？"
与相邻 skill 的区分
- 与
p03心地光明才华韫藏的区别: p03是"才华要藏"，p10是"功劳也要藏"；p03针对能力，p10针对功劳 - 与
p07忍让为高利人利己的区别: p07是主动让步，p10是"不邀功不求德"——p07是行动策略，p10是心态策略
E — 可执行步骤 (Execution)
当 skill 被激活后，agent 应按以下步骤执行:
-
识别用户是否在"邀功"或"求德"——内心有个声音在说"我做了这么多，应该被认可"
- 完成标准: 用户意识到自己在等待外部认可
-
用"无过便是功"测试：如果你做的事不出错，不需要别人认可，它的价值是什么？
- 完成标准: 用户找到不依赖外部评价的自我价值感
-
用"无怨便是德"测试：如果你帮助了别人，但你不期待回报，你是在做真正的善事吗？
- 完成标准: 用户区分"真正的善意"和"隐形的交易"
B — 边界 (Boundary) ★
不要在以下情况使用此 skill
- 需要明确绩效评估的组织：过度"无过便是功"会让有能力的人变得保守不前
- 职场晋升关键节点：此时需要适度展示成果，过度低调可能错过机会
- 对方故意贬低/打压你时：此时需要适当地维护自己的价值，不是完全无过便是功
作者在书中警告的失败模式
- 器小禄薄（来自反例ce14）：处处与人计较，只能占便宜不能吃亏，做决定只看短期
- 机制：计较功劳的人，禄薄泽短，因为没有人愿意与只计较小利的人合作
作者的盲点 / 时代局限
- 现代职场有完整的绩效评估体系，"无过便是功"可能导致被动不前
- 某些"邀功"是必要的职业保护，不让领导知道工作成果可能被视为没有贡献
容易混淆的邻近方法论
- 谦逊低调(p27)：p27更强调成功后要收敛；p10是日常心态——无论成功失败都不邀功
- 淡泊明志(p05)：p05是"志"要淡，p10是"功"要淡；p05更根本
相关 skills (阶段 3 填充)
- depends-on: p05淡泊明志, p03心地光明才华韫藏
- contrasts-with: p27骄泰失之谦虚受益
- composes-with: p07忍让为高利人利己
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 122 lines · 95 tokens per session scan A 3c45de187985
p10无过是功无怨是德 is a skill published in the GitHub repository ace3000chao/book2startup (80 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 95 tokens to every session and 1,633 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-engineering-toolkit
6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.
langsmith-observability
LLM observability platform for tracing, evaluation, and monitoring. Use when debugging LLM applications, evaluating model outputs against datasets, monitoring production systems, or building systematic testing pipelines for AI applications.
connect-agent
Connect the codebase's AI agent to LangWatch agent simulations, so test suites run against the real agent process. Adds a small connect function beside the service startup that calls the agent already in the codebase, which opens an outbound connection and registers the agent with its environment and its run…
prompt-optimization
Improve a prompt on the evaluations workbench through a measured loop. Score the baseline first, then duplicate the target column, form a hypothesis from failing rows, edit the copy's prompt draft, run, compare pass rate and cost, and repeat until the numbers hold. Use when the user asks to optimize or improve a…
trulens-evaluation-setup
Configure feedback functions and selectors for TruLens evaluations.
llm-as-judge-evaluation
Evaluate LLM outputs using frontier models as judges. Use for pairwise model comparison, quality scoring with custom rubrics, and automated evaluation pipelines. Covers position bias mitigation, statistical significance, and generating preference data for DPO/RLHF.