Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to acogood/spain-dnv-consultant. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/acogood/spain-dnv-consultant/main/.claude/skills/dnv-submission/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/acogood/spain-dnv-consultantWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/acogood/spain-dnv-consultant/dnv-submission)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/acogood/spain-dnv-consultant/dnv-submission"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/acogood/spain-dnv-consultant/dnv-submission/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/acogood/spain-dnv-consultant/dnv-submission"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/acogood/spain-dnv-consultant/dnv-submission.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium analysis-evasion · line 1 Suspicious Unicode normalization or mixed-script contentFix: Review the flagged content for security risks. Ensure no credentials, secrets, or sensitive data are exposed.
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 98 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00093 | $0.01991 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00996 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00398 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00199 |
Grade A, and why
dnv-submission scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 119 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Подготовка пакета «готов к подаче» — внутренний справочник
Когда пользователь готов к подаче, твоя задача — собрать пакет «готов к подаче» и инструкции по мониторингу/эскалации. Подаёт человек.
🚫 Необратимые действия — не твои
Движок НИКОГДА:
- не подаёт заявление на sede;
- не платит tasa (Modelo 790);
- не регистрирует expediente и не выдумывает REGAGE/expediente/номер;
- не имитирует факт подачи и не пишет статус «submitted».
Все {{REGAGE_*}} / {{EXPEDIENTE}} в документах остаются [ТРЕБУЕТСЯ: …],
пока пользователь не подал лично и не получил настоящий номер. Конечный
артефакт — чеклист + инструкции, не подача.
Финальный чеклист пакета
Собери user/drafts/submission_checklist.md из:
- реестра
knowledge_base/forms/registry.md(формы MI-T/MI-F, tasa); - чеклиста документов spec §3 (
user/spec.md) — основной заявитель + семья; - статусов из
user/drafts/review_summary.md(что OK / что WRONG/MISSING).
Если spec или review_summary ещё нет — работай с тем, что есть, и пометь, что риски/основания не сверены со spec.
По каждому документу: [ ] статус, критичность, «где взять/донести». Отметь
[ТРЕБУЕТСЯ]-поля из черновиков, которые надо закрыть до подачи.
Арифметика окна подачи (для renovación)
Из профиля (applicant.tie_expiry, applicant.first_approval_date) и норм
(knowledge_base/norms/plazos-silencio.md) посчитай даты:
- начало окна — ориентир, а не норма: «≈60 дней до истечения TIE» — это практика; нормативный якорь в базе не установлен (art. 76 числа «60» не содержит — оно стоит в art. 74 quáter.3 и относится к переходу visado → autorización). Подавай его с пометкой «(проверить вживую)», не как расчётный дедлайн;
- дата истечения TIE — из профиля, точная;
- поздний «хвост» — 90 дней после истечения: это art. 76.3, норма. Но
оговорка нормы обязательна к передаче: подача в хвосте продлевает разрешение, но
не защищает от
expediente sancionador; - рекомендуемая дата подачи; оплатить tasa (790-038) за 1–2 дня до.
⚠️ При
family.presentбланков два —tasa-790-038иtasa-790-038-familiar: пошлина платится отдельным бланком на каждого заявителя, с его именем и его NIE. Проверь, что оплачены оба, иначе человек приходит с недоплатой.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 119 lines · 93 tokens per session scan A c69f98654d2c
dnv-submission is a skill published in the GitHub repository acogood/spain-dnv-consultant (79 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 1,991 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
html-ppt-zhangzara-stencil-tablet
A workplace-safety compliance review for a manufacturing regulator — findings, the evidence chain, and the corrective mandate. Built as a decision-grade policy briefing deck for regulator, plant leadership.
treatment-plans
Format and structurally validate local treatment-plan documentation after clinical decisions have already been supplied and verified by authorized licensed professionals. Use for source traceability, clinician-authored intervention records, goals and checkpoints, shared-decision records, reconciliation handoffs, and…
handbook-updates
Diff a proposed handbook change against the current version, flag ripple effects and state supplement impacts. Use when user says "update the handbook", "add this to the handbook", "handbook change", or has a policy ready for insertion.
software-copyright-materials
A workflow for creating Chinese application materials for software copyright registration from a real software project.
iflytek-contract-intelligence-review
A contract-review workflow for scanned or digital agreements. It can recognize document text, examine clauses, detect risks, check compliance, and create translation summaries; its output is for review and is not formal legal advice.
legal-writer
Legal document drafting -- contracts, memos, briefs, complaints, demand letters, opinions, discovery, settlements, ToS, privacy policies. Full pipeline: document structure, per-section writing, Bluebook citation, case law lookup (CourtListener API), regulation lookup (eCFR API), DOCX output, and TDD-style verification…