typescript-google-style-review

typescript-google-style-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from acolomba/pi-claude-marketplace. It costs 39 tokens per session (3,080 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review guide for TypeScript code based on Google's style rules and the project's own conventions. It focuses on issues the compiler and lint tools may not catch, while first requiring those tools to pass.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review changed TypeScript files, check project-specific style decisions, and identify issues involving code structure, comments, naming, or rule exceptions.
Why use it?
It avoids duplicating automated checks and helps keep new code consistent without demanding unrelated cleanup of old code. It also separates style-only changes from functional work.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

Good fit Use it to review changed TypeScript files, check project-specific style decisions, and identify issues involving code structure, comments, naming, or rule exceptions.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/acolomba/pi-claude-marketplace/typescript-google-style-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add acolomba/pi-claude-marketplace --skill typescript-google-style-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/acolomba/pi-claude-marketplace

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for typescript-google-style-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/acolomba/pi-claude-marketplace/typescript-google-style-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/acolomba/pi-claude-marketplace/typescript-google-style-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/acolomba/pi-claude-marketplace/typescript-google-style-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/acolomba/pi-claude-marketplace/typescript-google-style-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for typescript-google-style-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/acolomba/pi-claude-marketplace/typescript-google-style-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/acolomba/pi-claude-marketplace/typescript-google-style-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 39 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,080 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium analysis-evasion · line 1
    Suspicious Unicode normalization or mixed-script content
    Fix: Review the flagged content for security risks. Ensure no credentials, secrets, or sensitive data are exposed.
  • medium MCP Rug Pull · line 14
    npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.
    Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
  • medium MCP Rug Pull · line 14
    npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.
    Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00039 $0.03080
Opus 5 $0.00019 $0.01540
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00616
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00308

Measured 7d ago against content hash e32756f22c28, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

typescript-google-style-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/typescript-google-style-review/SKILL.md · 138 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 138 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Google style review

Review checks derived from the Google Style Guide. Points this project decides for itself, rather than taking from the guide, are marked (project).

Review the files in the change under review. New files follow the rules completely; in an existing file, new code follows the file's conventions where the rules are silent but never violates a rule. Do not demand cleanups of unchanged code. Flag style-only churn mixed into a functional change; style-only edits go in their own change.

Gate on the toolchain first

Confirm npx tsc --noEmit and npx eslint . --max-warnings=0 pass. A failure of either is itself a finding; do not hand-review what the tools report. The toolchain gates: compilation, indentation, quotes, semicolons, trailing commas, brace placement and spacing, case indentation, line length, mandatory braces on control-flow bodies, === with the == null exception, dot notation, declare-before-use, unused variables, namespace, require(), @ts-ignore, and bare any. Do not open findings for these when the gate is green.

Where a rule overlaps the linter, review the part the linter cannot judge: every eslint-disable directive names one rule, carries a -- <reason>, and the reason holds for that line.

Quick scan

Grep the changed files for these tokens; every hit needs a stated justification or becomes a finding:

var · export default outside the extension entry point · export let · public · # private fields · const enum · debugger · with · eval / new Function · new String / new Number / new Boolean / new Object / new Array / Array( · parseInt / parseFloat · @ts-ignore / @ts-nocheck · @ts-expect-error outside a unit test · arguments · .bind( · <Type>value assertions · Object.defineProperty · prototype or global modification.

Formatting the linter does not check

  • Bodies do not begin or end with a blank line; one blank line separates methods and the constructor; blank lines inside a body only group statements.
  • Multi-line comments are consecutive // lines, not /* */ blocks; no boxes around comments.
  • Strings use the special escapes (\n, \t, \'), not numeric ones; a printable non-ASCII character appears as itself ('μs'); only non-printables are escaped, with a comment; the only whitespace character is the ASCII space.
  • No space after ...; the star is attached in function* and yield*.
  • No semicolon after a class declaration or method body; a statement containing a class expression keeps its semicolon.

Read the full file on GitHub · 138 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 138 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A e32756f22c28

Subscribe to this mod's changes

typescript-google-style-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository acolomba/pi-claude-marketplace (23 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 3,080 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

no-bare-casts

Writing as in TypeScript or TSX production code, modifying a file that contains a bare as cast, silencing a type error with a cast, encountering as unknown as, or reviewing a cast site.

prisma/orm · 52 tokens

coding-standards

Universal coding standards, best practices, and patterns for TypeScript, JavaScript, React, and Node.js development.

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins · 28 tokens

splitting-oversized-modules

Split an oversized Python module (a thousand-plus-line logic.py, models.py, api.py, or its test file) into a package of one module per concern, mechanically and provably without changing behavior. Use on a request to split / break up / decompose a god module or move functions out of one, once a human has agreed to…

PostHog/posthog · 197 tokens

plankton-code-quality

Write-time code quality enforcement using Plankton — auto-formatting, linting, and Claude-powered fixes on every file edit via hooks.

loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes · 34 tokens

typescript-style-guide

Apply, review, and explain the opinionated conventions in the TypeScript Style Guide. Use automatically only when TypeScript conventions are part of the requested task, including type modelling, discriminated unions, function APIs, variables and state, naming, source organization, React props, component APIs, state…

mkosir/typescript-style-guide · 79 tokens

architecture-audit

Systematic architecture audit and refactoring methodology for Rust + TypeScript codebases. Use when performing refactoring, cleanup, unification, code review, dead code removal, module reorganization, or tech debt elimination. Ensures no naming confusion, semantic overloading, hidden defaults, duplicate logic, or…

org2AI/ORG2 · 70 tokens