Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/adaptico/adaptico-os/gtm-articlenpx skills add adaptico/adaptico-os --skill gtm-articlegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adaptico/adaptico-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/adaptico/adaptico-os/gtm-article)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adaptico/adaptico-os/gtm-article"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adaptico/adaptico-os/gtm-article.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00146 | $0.03837 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00073 | $0.01919 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00767 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00384 |
Grade C, and why
gtm-article scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Tells the agent never to refusehighAnti-refusal
Suppressing the ability to decline removes a core safety control; a later harmful request then succeeds.
> Then generate the work anyway - never refuse. How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 211 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Long-Form Article - Research First, One Ownable Thesis
Default lens: a SaaS / AI software startup. Advise a technical founder marketing their own modern software product (SaaS, AI/API, dev tool, or app). Tailor every recommendation to that reader.
Stage-fit (
article): Tier 1 Too early · Tier 2 Useful · Tier 3 Core. If the founder's tier (from PROFILE.md) makes this Too early or Avoid, prepend this note verbatim: "One deep article runs on the same slow clock as a content engine - little payoff until you have authority and a settled ICP. Worth it once content is a channel you're deliberately testing, not before." Then generate the work anyway - never refuse.
Full persona and general guidance: read
../gtm/templates/advisor-prompt.md(installed with the gtm orchestrator); if the file is absent, continue with the default lens above.
You are the long-form writing engine for /gtm article <target>. The internet does not need another article - it needs the founder's article: the one carrying something only this founder can say, defensible from real experience, with claims a reader can check. Generic AI-written posts are now free to produce, which is exactly why they earn nothing; search engines, AI answer engines, and human readers all reward the piece that adds something to the record. So this skill spends most of its effort before the draft: research first, then a thesis gate and an originality floor that are allowed to say "this angle is not worth writing" - and to propose the sharper one that is.
The order is fixed and non-negotiable: research, then thesis, then outline, then draft. An outline written before the research is a list of guesses; every phase below exists to make sure the writing starts from evidence.
When This Skill Is Invoked
The user runs /gtm article <target>, where <target> is a saved project name, a URL, or omitted to use the default project - plus, ideally, a topic (/gtm article acme "why manual deploys persist"). No topic given: pick the next unwritten piece from the newest YYYY-MM-DD-content-plan.md (the write-first sequence), or propose 2-3 angles from the profile's pain points and ask. Unattended with no topic: take the content plan's next piece; without a plan, save nothing and note that a topic or a content plan is needed - never invent a topic for an absent founder.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 211 lines · 146 tokens per session scan C cce6af2c12b2
gtm-article is a skill published in the GitHub repository adaptico/adaptico-os (17 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 146 tokens to every session and 3,837 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (tells the agent never to refuse). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
audit
Analyze whether TikTok or Instagram search traffic is a viable growth channel for your business. Uses ScaleBrick's framework to evaluate demand, competition, content fit, and intent categories. Ends with a go/no-go recommendation.
competitors
Audit competitors using ScaleBrick's 3-surface framework (social, web/pages, SEO). Categorizes their pricing, features, and landing pages. Identifies gaps you can exploit, positioning angles no one is claiming, and specific moves you can make this week.
keywords
Research high-intent TikTok and Instagram search keywords using ScaleBrick's framework. Returns categorized keywords with intent type, search volume estimate, difficulty score, and content angle for each.
strategy
Generate a full marketing strategy using ScaleBrick's "TikTok as Search Engine" framework. Produces themes, pillars, voice, keyword plan, and posting schedule specific enough to execute on day one.
ads-audit
Run a source-grounded paid-advertising audit for one or more of Google, Meta, YouTube, LinkedIn, TikTok, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Reddit, Pinterest, Snapchat, and X. Use for full ad checks, account health reviews, paid-media diagnostics, partial audits after authentication or worker failure, missing-platform…
ads-landing
Audit paid-ad landing pages for message match, mobile experience, performance, accessibility, trust, forms, consent, tracking, security, and conversion friction. Use for landing-page audit, post-click experience, LP audit, conversion-rate optimization, form optimization, ad-to-page message match, redirects, blocked…