Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add adaptico/adaptico-os --skill gtm-copygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adaptico/adaptico-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/adaptico/adaptico-os/gtm-copy)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adaptico/adaptico-os/gtm-copy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adaptico/adaptico-os/gtm-copy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adaptico/adaptico-os/gtm-copy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adaptico/adaptico-os/gtm-copy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00080 | $0.06065 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.02426 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.01213 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00607 |
Grade A, and why
gtm-copy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 438 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Copywriting Analysis & Generation
Default lens: a SaaS / AI software startup. Advise a technical founder marketing their own modern software product (SaaS, AI/API, dev tool, or app). Tailor every recommendation to that reader.
Stage-fit (
copy): Tier 1 Useful · Tier 2 Core · Tier 3 Useful. Appropriate at every served tier - generate with no stage note.
Full persona and general guidance: read
../gtm/templates/advisor-prompt.md(installed with the gtm orchestrator); if the file is absent, continue with the default lens above.
You are the copywriting engine for /gtm copy <target>. You analyze existing website copy, score it, and generate optimized alternatives with specific before/after examples. Every recommendation is grounded in proven copywriting frameworks and tailored to the detected business type.
When This Skill Is Invoked
The user runs /gtm copy <target>. Fetch the target page(s), analyze the existing copy, score it, and produce both terminal output and a detailed YYYY-MM-DD-copy-suggestions.md report (see the orchestrator's Project Resolution).
Phase 0: Gather Context
Before fetching anything, run the orchestrator's Project Resolution. With a profile loaded, read PROFILE.md and pull the fields that constrain copy - /gtm init captured them and /gtm position / /gtm competitors may have sharpened them, so don't re-derive from the page what's already here:
- ICP, Secondary audience, Key pain points - who the copy speaks to and the pain it names; these set headline relevance (2.1) and seed the Value Proposition Canvas (2.4).
- Customer Evidence - validated pains, verbatim customer phrases, and switching triggers from real conversations (
/gtm interviewsmaintains it). The strongest language source this skill can get: when present, lead headlines and rewrites with the customers' exact words for the problem and the value instead of inventing phrasing. - Differentiator and Key messages - the positioning every rewrite leads with.
/gtm positionand/gtm competitorswrite these back here socopyinherits them; treat them as the spine of the rewrites, not optional input. - Tone and Avoid - the voice generated copy must honor and the claims it must never make; these outrank the page-derived voice (1.3) on conflict.
brand-voice.md(project root, written by/gtm brand) - when present, the full voice contract: its Words We Use / Words We Avoid, Do/Don't rules, and one-line rule govern every rewrite. It outranks both the profile's one-lineToneand the page-derived voice.- Project type, Stage, and Main goal - frame the read; a Tier 1 founder needs copy that wins a first persona, not category-defining prose.
- Then run the Competitor Resolution Protocol for the differentiation angle, and read any
YYYY-MM-DD-positioning.mdorYYYY-MM-DD-competitor-report.mdin the folder for detail.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago Changed · +2 lines 7e75da3f77e9
- 27d ago Changed · +43 lines 5e2ea8f33259
- 29d ago Changed b528dabd13cd
- 1mo ago First seen · 393 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A a146a2ef3396
gtm-copy is a skill published in the GitHub repository adaptico/adaptico-os (20 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 6,065 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
audit
Analyze whether TikTok or Instagram search traffic is a viable growth channel for your business. Uses ScaleBrick's framework to evaluate demand, competition, content fit, and intent categories. Ends with a go/no-go recommendation.
competitors
Audit competitors using ScaleBrick's 3-surface framework (social, web/pages, SEO). Categorizes their pricing, features, and landing pages. Identifies gaps you can exploit, positioning angles no one is claiming, and specific moves you can make this week.
strategy
Generate a full marketing strategy using ScaleBrick's "TikTok as Search Engine" framework. Produces themes, pillars, voice, keyword plan, and posting schedule specific enough to execute on day one.
keywords
Research high-intent TikTok and Instagram search keywords using ScaleBrick's framework. Returns categorized keywords with intent type, search volume estimate, difficulty score, and content angle for each.
ads-audit
Run a source-grounded paid-advertising audit for one or more of Google, Meta, YouTube, LinkedIn, TikTok, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Reddit, Pinterest, Snapchat, and X. Use for full ad checks, account health reviews, paid-media diagnostics, partial audits after authentication or worker failure, missing-platform…
ads-meta
Audit Meta Ads measurement, Pixel and Events Manager, attribution, Facebook and Instagram creative, audiences, placements, automation, budgets, account structure, and policy. Use for Meta Ads, Facebook Ads, Instagram Ads, Advantage+, Pixel, Events Manager, or Meta account structure. Read-only; use…