Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add adityaarakeri/senior-agent-skills --skill safe-refactorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adityaarakeri/senior-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/adityaarakeri/senior-agent-skills/safe-refactor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adityaarakeri/senior-agent-skills/safe-refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adityaarakeri/senior-agent-skills/safe-refactor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adityaarakeri/senior-agent-skills/safe-refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adityaarakeri/senior-agent-skills/safe-refactor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.00367 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00183 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00073 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
safe-refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 30 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A ffd6aa04c03e
safe-refactor is a skill published in the GitHub repository adityaarakeri/senior-agent-skills (1 stars, last pushed 23d ago), with no licence file. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 367 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
audit-pr
Audit a whole PR against the delivery contract and return MERGE-READY or evidenced blockers with the full URL. Consumes the current review-change REVIEW-PASS receipt instead of re-running review axes; posts a SHA-bound ready comment; never edits or merges. Triggers: "audit-pr", "is this PR ready", "merge gate".
fold-findings
Repair persisted fix-now findings in compatible atomic batches: root-cause fixes, green gate, commit/push, and per-row folded: yes updates. Never reclassify or substitute backlog notes. Triggers: "fold-findings", "fix the review findings", "repair audit blockers".
review-change
Review a change with only applicable internal axes, classify every finding, persist fix-now work, and return one evidence-backed decision. Findings only; --adversarial N uses isolated reviewers; --synthesize fuses supplied reviewer tables. Triggers: "review-change", "review this change", "adversarial review".
review-plan
Independent read-only review of a frozen Engineering plan before execution, in a context that did not cut it: feature or fix snapshot, obligation ledger sweep, phase and validator checks. Returns only PLAN-REVIEW-PASS or PLAN-REVIEW-FAIL with a snapshot-bound receipt (a product-intent gap is PLAN-REVIEW-FAIL with…
review-perf
Internal performance review pass of the agentic-workflow review pack — composed in-turn by review-change and product-audit; not a menu entry. Checks the changed paths for algorithmic and resource regressions: N+1s, hot-path allocations, asset weight, and leaks. Findings only; never edits code.
review-code
Internal correctness + simplification review pass of the agentic-workflow review pack — composed in-turn by review-change and product-audit; not a menu entry. Checks correctness, error handling, duplication, dead code, and simplification opportunities against the project's own conventions. Findings only; never edits…