Adobe Skills is a collection of skills, plugins, agents, and MCP servers that extend AI coding agents with workflows for Adobe products and other tasks. Developers use it to help coding agents work with Adobe analytics and application-building tools. The catalogue entries are the repository’s own skills, plugins, agents, and MCP integrations.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add adobe/skills --skill qagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adobe/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/adobe/skills/qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adobe/skills/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adobe/skills/qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adobe/skills/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adobe/skills/qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Agent Snooping · line 27 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00150 | $0.02004 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00060 | $0.00802 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00401 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00200 |
Grade A, and why
qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
stardust:qa — read-only site QA sweep
One live URL in. One evidence-bound findings report out. This skill never
edits anything — not site content, not DA documents, not repo code. Its only
writes are report artifacts under stardust/qa/. If the user wants findings
fixed, that is a separate, explicit follow-up outside this skill.
qa is the post-deploy counterpart of rollout's delivery verification: where
rollout asks "did every page ship?", qa asks "is everything that shipped
actually correct?" — at all three layers a deploy can silently break:
- delivery — what the pipeline serves (
.plain.html, full HTML, sheets, sitemap) - rendered — what a browser shows after block decoration (and what it does: an autoplay video that only shows its poster is a rendered defect)
- regression — what changed since the last approved state (visual baselines)
A green upper layer never implies the lower one: a publish 200 ≠ delivered, delivered HTML ≠ rendered correctly.
Setup
- Run the master skill's setup (
skills/stardust/SKILL.md§ Setup) if not already done this session.qaworks standalone too — it only needs a live base URL. - Resolve the base URL (the
*.aem.livehost or production domain). If the user didn't give one, look instardust/rollout/rollout.json(site.liveHost) or ask. - Resolve the inventory source — what pages the sweep covers, merged from
any of:
stardust/template-map.json(also supplies template assignments for conformance;scripts/from-knowledge.mjswrites it from a spec, plus allowlist entries for 404s the source already had), a paths file, and the livesitemap.xml(always fetched; parity mismatches become findings, so a wrong sitemap can't silently shrink coverage). - Optional inputs that unlock deeper checks:
--scrape stardust/scrape— verbatim fidelity vs the extraction capture--expected-blocks <json>— explicit per-template block expectations--parity <json>— dynamic parity file to replay (defaultstardust/dynamics/parity.json; thedynamicscheck reportsparity-missingwhen absent)--auth-header "token …"/--token-env SITE_TOKEN— protected origins; the secret is sent to the base origin only (otherwise derived by fleet consensus)--blocks-dir <dir>— the site'sblocks/checkout, so theeditabilitycheck can honour@ew-exemptJSDoc tags (otherwise pass--ew-exempt a,bfor index-driven blocks)
- Browser checks need playwright resolvable from the project (
node_modules/playwright). If missing, run the delivery-layer checks only (--checks routing,content,templates,metadata,links) and tell the user what was skipped. - Append a phase-transition line to
stardust/status.jsonlperreference/run-status.md(master skill) at sweep start/end.
What ships with it
25 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- reference/checks.md 15 KB
- schemas/qa-allowlist.schema.json 1.2 KB
- schemas/qa-report.schema.json 2.1 KB
- scripts/checks/ai-readability.mjs 3.5 KB runs code
- scripts/checks/browse.mjs 24 KB runs code
- scripts/checks/chrome.mjs 3.2 KB runs code
- scripts/checks/content.mjs 19 KB runs code
- scripts/checks/dynamics.mjs 2.7 KB runs code
- scripts/checks/editability.mjs 4.3 KB runs code
- scripts/checks/links.mjs 7.3 KB runs code
- scripts/checks/metadata.mjs 8.2 KB runs code
- scripts/checks/perf.mjs 5.1 KB runs code
- scripts/checks/routing.mjs 6.2 KB runs code
- scripts/checks/templates.mjs 3.8 KB runs code
- scripts/from-knowledge.mjs 5.7 KB runs code
- scripts/lib.mjs 13 KB runs code
- scripts/qa.mjs 9.3 KB runs code
- scripts/report-html.mjs 11 KB runs code
- scripts/test/chrome-check.test.mjs 1.2 KB runs code
- scripts/test/dropdown-unreachable.test.mjs 3.8 KB runs code
- scripts/test/favicon.test.mjs 2.7 KB runs code
- scripts/test/flattened.test.mjs 2.3 KB runs code
- scripts/test/from-knowledge.test.mjs 6.1 KB runs code
- scripts/test/single-block-hoard.test.mjs 4.3 KB runs code
- scripts/test/video-not-playing.test.mjs 2.3 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago Changed · +1 lines 8f16cb2c7a71
- 16d ago Changed · +1 lines 4c25df649d1b
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines · +12 tokens per session 53e077b16ca9
- 1mo ago Changed · +3 lines 9a3d852ec055
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 90185a10c407
- 1mo ago Changed · +5 lines 6512eaaa7a7a
- 1mo ago Changed · +12 lines 51ea09f3c91c
- 1mo ago First seen · 121 lines · 138 tokens per session scan A 3ea39f64ae5f
qa is a skill published in the GitHub repository adobe/skills (243 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 150 tokens to every session and 2,004 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
diagnosing-bugs
Build a tight, red-capable feedback loop before diagnosing failures, then minimize, test ranked hypotheses, and lock the fix with a regression test.
playwright-trace-analyzer
Analyzes Playwright E2E trace.zip archives (and bare trace JSONL when unpacked). Extracts the action timeline, network waterfall, console errors, and DOM-snapshot anchors, then identifies the highest-impact problems (flaky waits, slow selectors, network bottlenecks, hung actions, unhandled console errors, navigation…
adhoc-verification
Produce fresh, focused, local verification evidence for a code change without relying on the full test suite. Use when a system reminder (or the user) demands ad-hoc verification after an edit, or when you want to prove one behavior in isolation. Covers the correct way to write a throwaway supertest/harness script…
buildkite-playwright-failures
Analyze Playwright test logs on Buildkite to extract failed-only tests across jobs.
dogfood
Exploratory QA of web apps: find bugs, evidence, reports.
verify-omnigent
Drive Omnigent the way a user does and prove a behavior with recorded evidence, using an isolated server, runner, and mock model plus a feature map of every user entry point. Load before reproducing a user-facing bug, before claiming a fix works, or when reviewing whether a change covered every surface (session vs.…