Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai --skill containing-active-breachgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/containing-active-breach)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/containing-active-breach"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/containing-active-breach/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/containing-active-breach"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/containing-active-breach.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high YARA Match · line 170 YARA rule matched a hack tool or exploit indicator (offensive tools, reconnaissance, privilege escalation, or exploit frameworks).Fix: Remove offensive tool references and exploit code. Legitimate agent skills should not contain penetration testing tools, exploit frameworks, or reconnaissance utilities.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 188 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.02248 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01124 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00450 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00225 |
Grade A, and why
containing-active-breach scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- containing-active-breach — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- containing-active-breach — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 232 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Containing Active Breaches
When to Use
- A confirmed intrusion is in progress with an active adversary on the network
- Malware is spreading laterally across endpoints or servers
- A compromised account is being used for unauthorized access to systems
- Ransomware encryption has been detected and is actively propagating
- An attacker has established command-and-control communications from internal hosts
Do not use for post-incident cleanup when the adversary is no longer active; use eradication procedures instead.
Prerequisites
- Confirmed incident classification with P1 or P2 severity from triage
- EDR console access with host isolation capabilities (CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne)
- Network firewall and switch management access for segmentation
- Active Directory or identity provider administrative access for credential actions
- Pre-approved containment authority documented in the incident response plan
- Evidence preservation plan to avoid destroying forensic artifacts during containment
Workflow
Step 1: Assess Containment Scope
Before taking containment actions, map the full scope of compromise to avoid partial containment that alerts the adversary:
- Identify all confirmed compromised hosts via EDR telemetry and SIEM correlation
- Map lateral movement paths using authentication logs (Windows Event ID 4624 Type 3 and Type 10)
- Identify all compromised credentials (check for pass-the-hash, Kerberoasting, DCSync activity)
- Determine C2 channels (beacon intervals, domains, IPs, protocols)
- Assess whether the adversary has domain admin or equivalent privileges
Containment Scope Assessment:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Compromised Hosts: 5 (WKSTN-042, WKSTN-087, SRV-FILE01, SRV-DC02, WKSTN-103)
Compromised Accounts: 3 (jsmith, svc-backup, admin-tier0)
C2 Channels: HTTPS beacon to 185.220.x.x every 60s ± 15% jitter
Lateral Movement: PsExec via svc-backup, RDP via admin-tier0
Adversary Privilege: Domain Admin (admin-tier0 compromised)
Data at Risk: Finance share (\\SRV-FILE01\finance$) accessed
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 232 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 3e8883aa791d
containing-active-breach is a skill published in the GitHub repository adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai (57 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 2,248 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
containing-active-breach
Executes containment strategies to stop active adversary operations and prevent lateral movement during a confirmed security breach. Implements short-term and long-term containment using network segmentation, endpoint isolation, credential revocation, and access control modifications. Activates for requests involving…
containing-active-breach
Executes containment strategies to stop active adversary operations and prevent lateral movement during a confirmed security breach. Implements short-term and long-term containment using network segmentation, endpoint isolation, credential revocation, and access control modifications. Activates for requests involving…
importing-a-codebase
Use when the repo holds real source code but no specs: the existing-codebase branch of setting-up-a-project, normally reached via that dispatcher, directly only when the situation is unmistakable. Not for empty workspaces (starting-a-new-project) or feature work in a specced project (brainstorming).
starting-a-new-project
Use when the workspace is empty — no code yet — and the user brings a raw idea: the brand-new branch of setting-up-a-project, normally reached via that dispatcher, directly only when the situation is unmistakable. Not for features in an existing project — use brainstorming instead.
todos
This chat has a shared, live TODO plan — your tasks for the conversation, which the user also edits. Read this skill and reach for the todo tools whenever a request takes more than a couple of steps. It covers the plan model (group = task, items = its steps; loose items are the user's lane), how to work it: propose…
writing-workflow-skills
Use when adding a new workflow skill to pi-thinkrail-workflow, changing an existing workflow skill's role, trigger, handoff, or structure, or checking a workflow skill against the workflow system's rules. Not for authoring general-purpose skills outside this package.