Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai --skill correlating-security-events-in-qradargit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/correlating-security-events-in-qradar)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/correlating-security-events-in-qradar"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/correlating-security-events-in-qradar/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/correlating-security-events-in-qradar"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/correlating-security-events-in-qradar.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Data Exfiltration · line 170 Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00078 | $0.02571 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.01286 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00514 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00257 |
Grade A, and why
correlating-security-events-in-qradar scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -X POST "https://qradar.example.com/api/reference_data/sets" \ Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- correlating-security-events-in-qradar — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- correlating-security-events-in-qradar — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 296 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Correlating Security Events in QRadar
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- SOC analysts need to investigate QRadar offenses and correlate events across multiple log sources
- Detection engineers build custom correlation rules to identify multi-stage attacks
- Alert tuning is required to reduce false positive offenses and improve signal quality
- The team migrates from basic event monitoring to behavior-based correlation
Do not use for log source onboarding or parsing — that requires QRadar administrator access and DSM editor knowledge.
Prerequisites
- IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5+ with offense management enabled
- AQL knowledge for ad-hoc event and flow queries
- Log sources normalized with proper QID mappings (Windows, firewall, proxy, endpoint)
- User role with offense management, rule creation, and AQL search permissions
- Reference sets/maps configured for whitelist and watchlist management
Workflow
Step 1: Investigate an Offense with AQL
Open an offense in QRadar and query contributing events using AQL (Ariel Query Language):
SELECT DATEFORMAT(startTime, 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss') AS event_time,
sourceIP, destinationIP, username,
LOGSOURCENAME(logSourceId) AS log_source,
QIDNAME(qid) AS event_name,
category, magnitude
FROM events
WHERE INOFFENSE(12345)
ORDER BY startTime ASC
LIMIT 500
Pivot on the source IP to find all activity:
SELECT DATEFORMAT(startTime, 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss') AS event_time,
destinationIP, destinationPort, username,
QIDNAME(qid) AS event_name,
eventCount, category
FROM events
WHERE sourceIP = '192.168.1.105'
AND startTime > NOW() - 24*60*60*1000
ORDER BY startTime ASC
LIMIT 1000
Step 2: Build a Custom Correlation Rule
Create a multi-condition rule detecting brute force followed by successful login:
Rule 1 — Brute Force Detection (Building Block):
Rule Type: Event
Rule Name: BB: Multiple Failed Logins from Same Source
Tests:
- When the event(s) were detected by one or more of [Local]
- AND when the event QID is one of [Authentication Failure (5000001)]
- AND when at least 10 events are seen with the same Source IP
in 5 minutes
Rule Action: Dispatch new event (Category: Authentication, QID: Custom_BruteForce)
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 296 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A e93700ad34d3
correlating-security-events-in-qradar is a skill published in the GitHub repository adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai (57 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 2,571 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
correlating-security-events-in-qradar
Correlates security events in IBM QRadar SIEM using AQL (Ariel Query Language), custom rules, building blocks, and offense management to detect multi-stage attacks across network, endpoint, and application log sources. Use when SOC analysts need to investigate QRadar offenses, build correlation rules, or tune…
correlating-security-events-in-qradar
Correlates security events in IBM QRadar SIEM using AQL (Ariel Query Language), custom rules, building blocks, and offense management to detect multi-stage attacks across network, endpoint, and application log sources. Use when SOC analysts need to investigate QRadar offenses, build correlation rules, or tune…
correlating-security-events-in-qradar
Correlates security events in IBM QRadar SIEM using AQL (Ariel Query Language), custom rules, building blocks, and offense management to detect multi-stage attacks across network, endpoint, and application log sources. Use when SOC analysts need to investigate QRadar offenses, build correlation rules, or tune…
importing-a-codebase
Use when the repo holds real source code but no specs: the existing-codebase branch of setting-up-a-project, normally reached via that dispatcher, directly only when the situation is unmistakable. Not for empty workspaces (starting-a-new-project) or feature work in a specced project (brainstorming).
starting-a-new-project
Use when the workspace is empty — no code yet — and the user brings a raw idea: the brand-new branch of setting-up-a-project, normally reached via that dispatcher, directly only when the situation is unmistakable. Not for features in an existing project — use brainstorming instead.
todos
This chat has a shared, live TODO plan — your tasks for the conversation, which the user also edits. Read this skill and reach for the todo tools whenever a request takes more than a couple of steps. It covers the plan model (group = task, items = its steps; loose items are the user's lane), how to work it: propose…