Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai --skill coveragegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/coverage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/coverage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/coverage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00676 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00270 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00135 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- coverage — 100% identical, 2 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Analyze Test Coverage Gaps
Map all testable surfaces in the application and identify what's tested vs. what's missing.
Steps
1. Map Application Surface
Use the Explore subagent to catalog:
Routes/Pages:
- Scan route definitions (Next.js
app/, React Router config, Vue Router, etc.) - List all user-facing pages with their paths
Components:
- Identify interactive components (forms, modals, dropdowns, tables)
- Note components with complex state logic
API Endpoints:
- Scan API route files or backend controllers
- List all endpoints with their methods
User Flows:
- Identify critical paths: auth, checkout, onboarding, core features
- Map multi-step workflows
2. Map Existing Tests
Scan all *.spec.ts / *.spec.js files:
- Extract which pages/routes are covered (by
page.goto()calls) - Extract which components are tested (by locator usage)
- Extract which API endpoints are mocked or hit
- Count tests per area
3. Generate Coverage Matrix
## Coverage Matrix
| Area | Route | Tests | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Auth | /login | 5 | ✅ Covered |
| Auth | /register | 0 | ❌ Missing |
| Auth | /forgot-password | 0 | ❌ Missing |
| Dashboard | /dashboard | 3 | ⚠️ Partial (no error states) |
| Settings | /settings | 0 | ❌ Missing |
| Checkout | /checkout | 8 | ✅ Covered |
4. Prioritize Gaps
Rank uncovered areas by business impact:
- Critical — auth, payment, core features → test first
- High — user-facing CRUD, search, navigation
- Medium — settings, preferences, edge cases
- Low — static pages, about, terms
5. Suggest Test Plan
For each gap, recommend:
- Number of tests needed
- Which template from
templates/to use - Estimated effort (quick/medium/complex)
## Recommended Test Plan
### Priority 1: Critical
1. /register (4 tests) — use auth/registration template — quick
2. /forgot-password (3 tests) — use auth/password-reset template — quick
### Priority 2: High
3. /settings (4 tests) — use settings/ templates — medium
4. Dashboard error states (2 tests) — use dashboard/data-loading template — quick
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 99 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A a3a5c9728f6d
coverage is a skill published in the GitHub repository adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai (72 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 676 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
AI/ML Model Testing
Testing machine learning models including accuracy validation, bias detection, drift monitoring, A/B testing, and model regression testing.
workflow-patterns
Use this skill when implementing tasks according to Conductor's TDD workflow, handling phase checkpoints, managing git commits for tasks, or understanding the verification protocol.
running-livekit-simulations
Runs LiveKit agent simulations and acts on the results. Use when the user says "run my simulations", "regression test my agent before deploying", "run the scenarios", "use lk agent simulate", "did my agent pass", "why did this scenario fail", "run simulations in CI", "test the audio pipeline", "check turn-taking and…
designing-tests
Designs and implements testing strategies for any codebase. Use when adding tests, improving coverage, setting up testing infrastructure, debugging test failures, or when asked about unit tests, integration tests, or E2E testing.
memstack-development-webapp-testing
Use when the user says 'write browser tests', 'test this page', 'playwright test', 'e2e test', 'end to end test', 'browser test', 'test the UI', or needs Playwright-based browser testing for a web application. Do NOT use for unit tests, API tests, or non-browser testing.
playwright-api
API testing skill using Playwright's built-in APIRequestContext for RESTful service validation, authentication flows, and API contract verification.