Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bestagentkits/agency-skills --skill coveragegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bestagentkits/agency-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bestagentkits/agency-skills/coverage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bestagentkits/agency-skills/coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bestagentkits/agency-skills/coverage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bestagentkits/agency-skills/coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bestagentkits/agency-skills/coverage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00675 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00270 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00135 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to coverage — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Analyze Test Coverage Gaps
Map all testable surfaces in the application and identify what's tested vs. what's missing.
Steps
1. Map Application Surface
Use the Explore subagent to catalog:
Routes/Pages:
- Scan route definitions (Next.js
app/, React Router config, Vue Router, etc.) - List all user-facing pages with their paths
Components:
- Identify interactive components (forms, modals, dropdowns, tables)
- Note components with complex state logic
API Endpoints:
- Scan API route files or backend controllers
- List all endpoints with their methods
User Flows:
- Identify critical paths: auth, checkout, onboarding, core features
- Map multi-step workflows
2. Map Existing Tests
Scan all *.spec.ts / *.spec.js files:
- Extract which pages/routes are covered (by
page.goto()calls) - Extract which components are tested (by locator usage)
- Extract which API endpoints are mocked or hit
- Count tests per area
3. Generate Coverage Matrix
## Coverage Matrix
| Area | Route | Tests | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Auth | /login | 5 | ✅ Covered |
| Auth | /register | 0 | ❌ Missing |
| Auth | /forgot-password | 0 | ❌ Missing |
| Dashboard | /dashboard | 3 | ⚠️ Partial (no error states) |
| Settings | /settings | 0 | ❌ Missing |
| Checkout | /checkout | 8 | ✅ Covered |
4. Prioritize Gaps
Rank uncovered areas by business impact:
- Critical — auth, payment, core features → test first
- High — user-facing CRUD, search, navigation
- Medium — settings, preferences, edge cases
- Low — static pages, about, terms
5. Suggest Test Plan
For each gap, recommend:
- Number of tests needed
- Which template from
templates/to use - Estimated effort (quick/medium/complex)
## Recommended Test Plan
### Priority 1: Critical
1. /register (4 tests) — use auth/registration template — quick
2. /forgot-password (3 tests) — use auth/password-reset template — quick
### Priority 2: High
3. /settings (4 tests) — use settings/ templates — medium
4. Dashboard error states (2 tests) — use dashboard/data-loading template — quick
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 99 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 82e86161745b
coverage is a skill published in the GitHub repository bestagentkits/agency-skills (24 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 675 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to coverage, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
maintain-verification-skill
Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature, at most one PR of proven corrections. Use for /maintain-verification-skill or "audit the verify skill".
create-verification-skill
Generate a project-local verification skill that drives your app the way a user does — any language, framework, or platform. Use for /create-verification-skill, "make a control skill for this repo", or when a project has no scripted way to prove UI/CLI/service behavior.
actionbook-web-test
Run browser-based web tests against websites using Actionbook CLI. Activate when the user wants to test a website workflow, run smoke tests, verify a user flow, check if a web application works, run regression tests, or validate browser-based interactions. Supports test definition, execution, assertion, reporting, and…
ios-simulator-skill
Build, test, and drive iOS apps in the Simulator with 30 token-efficient scripts. Use when asked to build or test an Xcode project, launch an app on a simulator, tap/type/swipe through its UI by accessibility label, take screenshots or visual diffs, audit accessibility, read logs or diagnose hangs, or manage…
web-test
A browser-automation tool for testing the 1C:Enterprise web client. It uses Playwright to navigate sections, fill forms, read tables and reports, and perform user actions in a browser.
f1-test-drive
Assess F1 applicability, then validate changed product workflows or the F1 harness end-to-end. Skip drives and reports when no relevant workflow behavior changes.