investigation-report

investigation-report is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from aeonfun/aeon. It costs 52 tokens per session (7,986 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A one-command security investigation for a token on Base, an Ethereum-compatible blockchain network. It combines selected checks into one report and verdict.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to check for rug-pull risk, contract permissions and proxies, deployer history, concentrated ownership, honeypot trading restrictions, and locked liquidity.
Why use it?
It brings several common token risks into one investigation instead of requiring separate checks for the contract, deployer, holders, trading behaviour, and liquidity.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to check for rug-pull risk, contract permissions and proxies, deployer history, concentrated ownership, honeypot trading restrictions, and locked liquidity.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/aeonfun/aeon/investigation-report
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add aeonfun/aeon --skill investigation-report
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aeonfun/aeon

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for investigation-report

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aeonfun/aeon/investigation-report.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aeonfun/aeon/investigation-report)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aeonfun/aeon/investigation-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aeonfun/aeon/investigation-report.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 52 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 7,986 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 2 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 17 findings, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 37
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 59
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 86
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 111
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 153
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 161
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 179
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 180
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 78
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 117
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 131
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 220
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 238
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 245
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 268
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 285
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 227
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00052 $0.07986
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.03993
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.01597
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00799

Measured 2d ago against content hash ea458a1bf6dd, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

investigation-report scanned grade A with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Sends data to an external URLlowData exfiltration

A POST to an outside endpoint may be telemetry or may be exfiltration; either way the mod talks to somewhere, and you should know where.

curl -m 10 -s -X POST "$RPC" -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{

Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

curl -m 10 -s -X POST "${BASE_RPC_URL:-https://mainnet.base.org}" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

skills/investigation-report/SKILL.md · 405 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 405 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

${var} — Base subject to investigate, plus optional flags: <token-address> [--checks=rug,contract,deployer,holders,honeypot,lp] [--depth=quick|deep]. The first token is the subject contract address (0x…, required). --checks= is a comma-list selecting which analyzers to run (default = all six). --depth= is quick (the old rug-scan fast path — minimal reads) or deep (full standalone logic of each selected check; default). If the subject address is empty, log REPORT_NO_TARGET and exit cleanly (no notify).

Examples:

  • 0xToken → all six checks, deep report.
  • 0xToken --checks=honeypot → only the honeypot simulation (reproduces the standalone honeypot-check exactly, incl. its HONEYPOT_* end-states).
  • 0xToken --checks=rug,lp --depth=quick → rug verdict + LP-lock, fast path.
  • 0xToken --checks=contract,deployer,holders --depth=deep → structural audit + deployer entity intel + full concentration.

The "tell me everything about this token" skill. Instead of running six checks by hand, this composes them into one structured report behind a selector: rug risk, contract audit (verification / owner powers / proxy), deployer trace (who shipped it and their history), holder concentration (whale risk), honeypot (can you actually sell?), and LP lock (can the team pull liquidity?) — with a one-line summary on top.

Designed to degrade gracefully: each selected section runs independently, so a section that needs a key (or returns nothing) is marked unavailable without aborting the rest. Selecting a single check makes the composite behave as that one analyzer — same steps, same thresholds, same notify format, same status codes.

Config

  • Subject = the first token of ${var} (validate: 0x + 40 hex). Chain = Base (chainid=8453, explorer basescan.org).
  • Etherscan v2 unified API (https://api.etherscan.io/v2/api?chainid=8453&…) — used by the rug, contract, deployer, holders checks. Works keyless at a lower rate limit.
  • Base RPC (${BASE_RPC_URL:-https://mainnet.base.org}) — used by honeypot, lp, and the eth_call/eth_getLogs/eth_getStorageAt/eth_getCode reads inside the other checks. Keyless; any standard JSON-RPC endpoint works.
  • Secrets (all optional):
    • ETHERSCAN_API_KEY (a.k.a. BASESCAN_API_KEY — same Etherscan v2 key) — appended to the Etherscan URL as &apikey=… via ./secretcurl's {ETHERSCAN_API_KEY} placeholder (never a bare $SECRET on the line, never a header). Raises the rate limit and unlocks verified source, full deployer history, and the holder list. Used by rug, contract, deployer, holders.
    • BASE_RPC_URL — overrides the default public Base RPC. Used by every RPC read; primary for honeypot and lp.
  • Preamble (run once, before dispatch): read memory/MEMORY.md and the last ~2–3 days of memory/logs/ so a repeat investigation can note what changed since last time and avoid re-reporting the same signal. Parse ${var} → subject address, --checks (default all six), --depth (default deep).

Read the full file on GitHub · 405 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 405 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A ea458a1bf6dd

Subscribe to this mod's changes

investigation-report is a skill published in the GitHub repository aeonfun/aeon (716 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 7,986 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 2 findings (sends data to an external url, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

defi-protocol-templates

Implement DeFi protocols with production-ready templates for staking, AMMs, governance, and flash loans. Use when building decentralized finance applications or smart contract protocols.

wshobson/agents · 38 tokens

nft-standards

Implement NFT standards (ERC-721, ERC-1155) with proper metadata handling, minting strategies, and marketplace integration. Use when creating NFT contracts, building NFT marketplaces, or implementing digital asset systems.

wshobson/agents · 48 tokens

web3-testing

Test smart contracts comprehensively using Hardhat and Foundry with unit tests, integration tests, and mainnet forking. Use when testing Solidity contracts, setting up blockchain test suites, or validating DeFi protocols.

wshobson/agents · 46 tokens

solidity-security

Master smart contract security best practices to prevent common vulnerabilities and implement secure Solidity patterns. Use when writing smart contracts, auditing existing contracts, or implementing security measures for blockchain applications.

wshobson/agents · 38 tokens

flowcraft-config

Author, validate, and troubleshoot complete FlowCraft deployment configuration (deploy.yaml with the runtime section, inference/workspace/sandbox/tool sub-documents, core/memory contracts, and graph JSON node wiring). Use when writing or reviewing FlowCraft configs, assembling an agent deployment, adding…

GizClaw/flowcraft · 96 tokens

blockchain-web3

Solidity smart contracts, Web3 development, DeFi protocols, NFTs, EVM chains, Hardhat/Foundry tooling, and blockchain security. Use when writing smart contracts, building dApps, auditing contract security, or integrating Web3 wallets.

travisjneuman/.claude · 55 tokens