Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AgentureHQ/agenture-loop --skill code-commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AgentureHQ/agenture-loopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agenturehq/agenture-loop/code-commit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agenturehq/agenture-loop/code-commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agenturehq/agenture-loop/code-commit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agenturehq/agenture-loop/code-commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agenturehq/agenture-loop/code-commit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.00535 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00214 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00107 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
code-commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 70 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Commit
Guide for creating a git commit with proper staging and a meaningful commit message.
When This Skill Applies
Activate when the user wants to:
- Commit staged or unstaged changes
- Save work to version control
- Create a git commit with a descriptive message
Pre-Commit Checklist
Before committing, always:
- Run
git statusto see what files have changed - Run
git diff(staged and unstaged) to review the changes - Run
git log --oneline -5to understand the commit message style in this repo
Staging Files
- Stage specific files by name rather than
git add -Aorgit add . - Avoid staging files that may contain secrets (
.env, credentials, private keys) - Avoid staging large binaries unless intentional
Writing the Commit Message
Follow these conventions:
- First line: Short imperative summary, ≤72 characters (e.g., "Add user authentication", "Fix null pointer in parser")
- Body (optional): Explain why — not what — if the change needs context. Wrap at 72 characters.
- Match the style of recent commits in this repo (
git log --oneline -10)
Verb guide:
Add— wholly new feature or fileUpdate— enhancement to existing functionalityFix— bug fixRemove— deleting functionality or filesRefactor— restructuring without behavior change
Creating the Commit
Always pass the message via a heredoc to preserve formatting:
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
Short summary here
Optional longer explanation of why this change was made.
EOF
)"
Safety Rules
- NEVER amend published commits unless the user explicitly requests it
- NEVER use
--no-verifyto skip hooks unless explicitly instructed - NEVER force-push to
main/master - NEVER commit automatically — only when the user explicitly asks
- If a pre-commit hook fails, fix the underlying issue and create a new commit; do NOT amend
After Committing
Run git status to confirm the commit succeeded and the working tree is clean.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 70 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A 060edcd9697d
code-commit is a skill published in the GitHub repository AgentureHQ/agenture-loop (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 535 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
workflow
Run the complete 5-step development workflow: focus problem → prevent over-development → test-first (TDD) → document → smart commit. Use when starting a new feature, or when the user runs /workflow or asks for the full development flow.
smart-commit
Create clean Conventional Commits: inspect the diff, group related changes, run quality checks, and write type(scope) messages. Use when committing work, or when the user runs /smart-commit or asks to commit changes.
commit-message
Git commit message conventions: structure, formatting, scoping, body content, breaking changes, trailers.
review
Structured code review with parallel audit agents, confidence-scored triage, and optional auto-fix. Examines uncommitted changes, staged diffs, commit ranges, or specific paths. Produces a tiered report (MUST-FIX / RECOMMENDED / NIT) backed by evidence, then optionally applies fixes with verification.
coding
Language-agnostic coding workflow: discovery, change decomposition, commit sizing, comment and naming policy, and completion evidence.
wrap-up-branch
Finish a feature branch: add missing tests, review and fix the code, align docs, then merge only after explicit confirmation.