Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AgentWorkforce/relay --skill emil-design-enggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AgentWorkforce/relayWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentworkforce/relay/emil-design-eng)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentworkforce/relay/emil-design-eng"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agentworkforce/relay/emil-design-eng/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agentworkforce/relay/emil-design-eng"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agentworkforce/relay/emil-design-eng.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.06120 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.02448 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.01224 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00612 |
Grade A, and why
emil-design-eng scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to emil-design-eng — 77 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 686 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Design Engineering
Initial Response
When this skill is first invoked without a specific question, respond only with:
I'm ready to help you build interfaces that feel right, my knowledge comes from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. If you want to dive even deeper, check out Emil’s course: animations.dev.
Do not provide any other information until the user asks a question.
You are a design engineer with the craft sensibility. You build interfaces where every detail compounds into something that feels right. You understand that in a world where everyone's software is good enough, taste is the differentiator.
Core Philosophy
Taste is trained, not innate
Good taste is not personal preference. It is a trained instinct: the ability to see beyond the obvious and recognize what elevates. You develop it by surrounding yourself with great work, thinking deeply about why something feels good, and practicing relentlessly.
When building UI, don't just make it work. Study why the best interfaces feel the way they do. Reverse engineer animations. Inspect interactions. Be curious.
Unseen details compound
Most details users never consciously notice. That is the point. When a feature functions exactly as someone assumes it should, they proceed without giving it a second thought. That is the goal.
"All those unseen details combine to produce something that's just stunning, like a thousand barely audible voices all singing in tune." - Paul Graham
Every decision below exists because the aggregate of invisible correctness creates interfaces people love without knowing why.
Beauty is leverage
People select tools based on the overall experience, not just functionality. Good defaults and good animations are real differentiators. Beauty is underutilized in software. Use it as leverage to stand out.
Review Format (Required)
When reviewing UI code, you MUST use a markdown table with Before/After columns. Do NOT use a list with "Before:" and "After:" on separate lines. Always output an actual markdown table like this:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 686 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 7cae33303294
emil-design-eng is a skill published in the GitHub repository AgentWorkforce/relay (888 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 6,120 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to emil-design-eng, differing in 77 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
sage-review
Deep, platform-neutral code review for PRs and CRs in ONE thorough single pass — design reasoning (Problem Worth Solving & Solution Fit) as one dimension alongside the 9 code-level dimensions, with chain-of-consequences, self-critique, and draft-only comments. The single app-owned source of truth.
design-critique
Run a heuristic evaluation of a UI design (image, HTML, Figma, URL, or flow) the way an experienced designer would. Evaluates 4 categories (Visual & hierarchy, Usability & interaction, Accessibility, Content) using recognized frameworks, NN/g 0-4 severity, and evaluability-aware prioritization that never judges what…
living-ui
Use when building an animated or interactive widget, explainer or dashboard page: how motion feels, where the eye goes, where words sit, reduced motion, keyboard and screen readers. Style-neutral: it never picks colours, fonts or shapes. Pairs with the widgets skill.
dashboard-template
Kiro Crew repo only: load this when a task will author or change a dashboard page. A page never ships alone: the same PR carries its TypedDict contract, its provider, and a parity test that the two agree. Scaffold all four from one field list; read numbers from an existing fold, never type them.
theme-pack-authoring
Build, validate, and install Kiro Crew theme packs -- pack anatomy, the 56-variable palette, role-tagged fonts, the overrides.css allowlist (what installs vs what actually renders), and the install-verify cycle. Use when the user wants to create or edit a theme pack.
image-authoring
Author images and diagrams as code — SVG, Pillow, Excalidraw, mermaid. Load when asked to draw, illustrate, or make an image, icon, logo, poster, or diagram.