Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to aget-framework/aget. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aget-framework/aget/main/.claude/skills/aget-make-decision/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aget-framework/agetWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aget-framework/aget/aget-make-decision)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aget-framework/aget/aget-make-decision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aget-framework/aget/aget-make-decision/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aget-framework/aget/aget-make-decision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aget-framework/aget/aget-make-decision.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Memory Poisoning · line 63 Skill manipulates agent memory, state, or stored context. Memory corruption can alter personality, override safety rules, or cause unpredictable behavior.Fix: Protect agent memory and state from modification by untrusted content. Use read-only memory for critical instructions and validate all state changes.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00584 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00234 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00117 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
aget-make-decision scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 124 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
aget-make-decision
Make decisions with documented rationale, authority verification, and communication plan. Creates decision records for audit trail.
Instructions
When this skill is invoked:
-
Verify Authority
- Check if decision is within authority scope
- Identify if escalation needed
- Note delegation if applicable
-
Analyze Options
- Document options considered
- Evaluate pros/cons
- Assess risks per option
-
Make Decision
- Select option
- Document rationale
- Note trade-offs accepted
-
Plan Communication
- Identify stakeholders
- Determine communication method
- Draft key messages
-
Create Decision Record
- ADR-style documentation
- Enable future reference
- Support audit requirements
Output Format
# Decision Record: [Title]
**Date**: [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Decision Maker**: [Agent/Role]
**Status**: [Proposed / Accepted / Superseded]
---
## Context
[What situation requires this decision]
---
## Decision
**We will**: [Clear statement of decision]
---
## Authority
| Check | Status |
|-------|--------|
| Within scope | [Yes/No/Escalate] |
| Delegation | [N/A or source] |
---
## Options Considered
| Option | Pros | Cons | Risk |
|--------|------|------|------|
| [Option 1] | [+] | [-] | [Risk] |
| [Option 2] | [+] | [-] | [Risk] |
| **Selected** | | | |
---
## Rationale
[Why this option was chosen over alternatives]
---
## Trade-offs Accepted
- [What we're giving up]
- [What we're gaining]
---
## Communication Plan
| Stakeholder | Method | Timing | Key Message |
|-------------|--------|--------|-------------|
| [Who] | [Email/Meeting/etc.] | [When] | [What to convey] |
---
## Consequences
- [Expected outcome 1]
- [Potential risk to monitor]
Constraints
- C1: NEVER make decisions exceeding authority scope — authority boundaries must be respected
- C2: NEVER skip rationale documentation — decisions need audit trail
- C3: NEVER communicate decisions without stakeholder identification — wrong audience creates confusion
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 124 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A d6dbd6877252
aget-make-decision is a skill published in the GitHub repository aget-framework/aget (12 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 584 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
aget-close-project
Close a PROJECTPLAN with verifiable-assertion gate (V-tests + commits + retrospective), deferred-surface scan for next-plan handoff, and status transition (ACTIVE → COMPLETE / CLOSED / ABANDONED / SUPERSEDED). Strict counterpart to /aget-create-project (D71 Layer 2). Closes asymmetric verb-pair gap at PROJECTPLAN…
aget-release-critique
Adversarial review with the Critic perspective of the Release Delivery Triad (L818). Dual mandate — spec coverage audit plus deep bug finding, asking what breaks in the field and which assumptions are wrong. Superseded by /aget-check-release.
aget-release-audit-specs
Audit specifications with the Spec Auditor perspective of the Release Delivery Triad (L818) — coverage and consistency mode, asking whether a spec covers all behaviors and where gaps or contradictions remain. Superseded by /aget-check-release.
aget-release-build
Execute release gate deliverables with the Builder perspective of the Release Delivery Triad (L818) — speed-optimized execution asking whether the work is done, fast, and functional. Superseded by /aget-create-release.
aget-file-issue
File issues with L520 governance compliance.
aget-propose-actions
Propose ranked next-best actions with evidence grounding, time budgets, and execute-all default. Formalizes the fleet's highest-frequency interaction pattern.