Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to aget-framework/aget. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aget-framework/aget/main/.claude/skills/aget-propose-initiative/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aget-framework/agetWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aget-framework/aget/aget-propose-initiative)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aget-framework/aget/aget-propose-initiative"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aget-framework/aget/aget-propose-initiative/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aget-framework/aget/aget-propose-initiative"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aget-framework/aget/aget-propose-initiative.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 4 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Prompt Injection · line 150 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
- high Prompt Injection · line 164 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
- high Prompt Injection · line 195 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 359 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.04759 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.02380 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00952 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00476 |
Grade A, and why
aget-propose-initiative scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- aget-propose-initiative — 94% identical, 6 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 379 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/aget-propose-initiative
Create a lightweight initiative proposal before committing to full /aget-create-initiative scaffolding. Follows governance pattern: propose → review → approve → create. Implements AGET_INITIATIVE_SPEC v1.0.1 clauses CAP-INIT-PROP-001 through CAP-INIT-PROP-012.
Purpose
Prevent direct authoring of INIT-*.md manifests without a proposal gate. Per L867 (artifact-needs-skill pattern) and ADR-008 (L-doc evidence → SOP → Spec → Skill ladder), this skill closes the propose-half of the initiative verb-pair (the create-half is /aget-create-initiative, currently proposed but not implemented).
Evidence:
- 2026-04-19 INIT-REQ-SPEC-TEST-DEFINED authored via direct Write — no proposal gate, no cross-initiative overlap check (
planning/skill-proposals/PROPOSAL_aget-create-initiative.md) - 7 existing
PROPOSAL_init_*.mdfiles (PP-014, 016, 017, 018, 019, 020, 027) authored via/aget-propose-project(not yet in this package — manager-seat skill) — 0/7 contain Channels, Contributors, or Cross-Initiative Overlap sections (empirical grep 2026-05-14) - gh#1193 INIT-PRINCIPLED-EXECUTION referenced in scope tables without file — decorative-reference anti-pattern
Governing Spec: ../aget/specs/AGET_INITIATIVE_SPEC.md v1.0.1 (canonical commit 7bb93f0)
Input
$ARGUMENTS — Initiative topic, theme, or problem description
Examples:
/aget-propose-initiative issue-inbox stewardship for 1228 open issues/aget-propose-initiative cross-fleet observation propagation discipline/aget-propose-initiative skill canonical promotion fleet-wide
If no arguments provided:
Error: Initiative topic required.
Usage: /aget-propose-initiative <topic or theme description>
Example: /aget-propose-initiative issue-inbox stewardship
Execution
Step 1: Parse Input
Extract from $ARGUMENTS:
- Topic: What the initiative addresses
- Proposed INIT-ID:
INIT-{UPPER-KEBAB-CASE}derived from topic (e.g., "issue-inbox stewardship" →INIT-ISSUE-INBOX-STEWARDSHIP) - Snake-case filename slug: lowercase snake_case for
PROPOSAL_init_{slug}.md(e.g.,issue_inbox_stewardship)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 379 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A c12b3c4d6ddd
aget-propose-initiative is a skill published in the GitHub repository aget-framework/aget (11 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 4,759 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
aget-close-project
Close a PROJECTPLAN with verifiable-assertion gate (V-tests + commits + retrospective), deferred-surface scan for next-plan handoff, and status transition (ACTIVE → COMPLETE / CLOSED / ABANDONED / SUPERSEDED). Strict counterpart to /aget-create-project (D71 Layer 2). Closes asymmetric verb-pair gap at PROJECTPLAN…
aget-file-issue
File issues with L520 governance compliance.
aget-create-initiative
Scaffold approved initiative manifests at planning/initiatives/INIT-.md. Mirrors /aget-create-project STRICT (D71 Layer 2) — direct Write/Edit to planning/initiatives/ is PROHIBITED once this skill is invoked. Implements SOPinitiative.md (graduated procedure) + future AGETINITIATIVESPEC. Consumes PROPOSALinit.md…
aget-create-project
Create research projects with context-aware scaffolding. Reads AGET identity, searches prior work, pre-populates Due Diligence. Use when starting any formal AGET project.
aget-check-initiative
Read-only cross-system coherence check for initiatives. Aggregates state from KB, GitHub, Linear, and Slack, then reports alignment and drift.
aget-review-project
Mid-flight review of active project plans. Assesses gate progress, V-test completion, blockers, and recommendations. Use to evaluate project health.