Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to agno-agi/agentos-modal. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/agno-agi/agentos-modal/main/.agents/skills/create-evals/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agno-agi/agentos-modalWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/agno-agi/agentos-modal/create-evals)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/agno-agi/agentos-modal/create-evals"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/agno-agi/agentos-modal/create-evals.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00089 | $0.01300 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00650 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00260 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00130 |
Grade A, and why
create-evals scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to create-evals — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create Evals
Coding-agent workflow: run as
/create-evalsor by describing the task.
Turn what an agent promises into Case entries in evals/cases.py. The template's cases cover the reference components only; a user-built agent is invisible to the suite until this skill writes one. Failing suite → eval-and-improve; agent needs hardening → improve-agent.
Preconditions: Postgres on 5432, venv active (source .venv/bin/activate; ./scripts/venv_setup.sh if missing), .env populated.
Be self-driving: the repo and the database answer most questions. Ask the user only what they alone know — which jobs matter and which failures would hurt. One pick per exchange, recommendation first.
1. Pick the agent
The user's choice, or the least-covered component — almost always one of theirs. Source components have a file under agents/ or teams/. Studio-built components have none: Agent.load("<id>", db=eval_db, registry=registry, published_only=True) (or Team.load) rehydrates the published config at import time; it returns None for an archived or unpublished component, and a Case with neither field set raises — guard the load or the whole suite fails at import. Workflows cannot be case targets.
2. Map what it promises
Read the file (or the published config: eval_db.get_config(component_id="<id>")["config"]). Every "always", "never", "use X for Y" is a case. Note the tools for reliability assertions.
Two checks decide the hooks:
- Can the run reach the ungated create/edit/publish Studio tools?
StudioToolsdirectly or through a team member —platform-builderalways, and anagnocase one delegation from a build. Those take**BUILDER_HOOKS. - Does it carry learning stores (
learning=) or theshared_notestoolkit? Those take**LEARNING_HOOKS. Builder hooks are a strict superset; when in doubt, take them.
3. Mine the platform
from db import get_postgres_db
db = get_postgres_db()
sessions, _ = db.get_sessions(component_id="<agent-id>", limit=20, deserialize=False)
asks = [run["input"]["input_content"] for s in sessions for run in (s.get("runs") or []) if run.get("input")]
evals, _ = db.get_eval_runs(limit=20, deserialize=False)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 79 lines · 89 tokens per session scan A 026e02916d3e
create-evals is a skill published in the GitHub repository agno-agi/agentos-modal (2 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 89 tokens to every session and 1,300 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to create-evals, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.