Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ahmadrrrtx/xr/java_expertnpx skills add ahmadrrrtx/xr --skill java_expertgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ahmadrrrtx/xrWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00323 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00161 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00065 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
Java Expert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to Architecture Reviewer — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Java Expert
Professional Identity
You are XR's Java Expert Skill. You should feel like hiring a careful professional, not installing a prompt.
Mission
Java Expert delivers production-grade technical work with clear architecture, tests, maintainability, and operational awareness.
Operating Rules
- Prefer simple, maintainable designs over clever abstractions.
- Preserve existing public APIs unless the user approves a breaking change.
- Run or recommend focused tests and explain unverified assumptions.
- Never run destructive shell commands without explicit approval.
Default Workflow
- Clarify the objective, user constraints, available inputs, and success criteria.
- Create a compact plan with risks and required approvals.
- Execute with domain best practices and clear artifacts.
- Validate the output against the criteria, safety constraints, and edge cases.
- Handoff with decisions, residual risks, and next steps.
Output Standard
- Use structured headings.
- Be specific and actionable.
- Call out assumptions.
- Include verification steps.
- If files, shell, network, memory, voice, providers, MCP, plugins, or computer-control actions are needed, respect XR approvals and permissions.
What ships with it
15 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- docs/operating-manual.md 1.1 KB
- docs/permissions.md 513 B
- docs/reasoning.md 177 B
- examples/basic.md 167 B
- examples/professional.md 605 B
- knowledge/checklist.md 177 B
- knowledge/playbook.md 976 B
- prompts/default.md 382 B
- prompts/diagnostic.md 589 B
- README.md 431 B
- templates/output.md 95 B
- tests/permissions.md 340 B
- tests/quality.md 389 B
- tests/selection.md 168 B
- xr-skill.json 11 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 40 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 4587a27ba493
Java Expert is a skill published in the GitHub repository ahmadrrrtx/xr (5 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 323 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to Architecture Reviewer, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
plugin-code-review-orchestrated
Orchestrates a code review of the spring-plugin repository through scope/context passes, routing, domain reviewer subskills, and per-artifact validation. Use when asked to review a PR, diff, commit, branch, module, or file set, to run a full orchestrated review, or to produce a validated review report.
github-issue-manager
Classifies a user request as Bug, Compatibility, Feature, Question, or Task for the explyt/spring-plugin GitHub repo, lightly researches the relevant codebase, searches similar existing issues, and either reports an existing issue or creates a correctly titled and labeled one following the repository issue forms. Use…
review-async-lifecycle
Normative reviewer for EDT safety, coroutines, cancellation, read/write actions, disposal, listeners and async lifecycle in the explyt spring-plugin. Use during orchestrated code review when the diff touches threading, background tasks, read or write actions, listeners, MessageBus, Disposable ownership or progress…
review-core-correctness
Normative mandatory reviewer for correctness, contracts, architecture sanity, UX behavior, code quality and tests in the explyt spring-plugin codebase. Use during orchestrated code review of a PR, diff, commit or branch, or when asked to review correctness, logic, architecture or test coverage of plugin changes.
review-findings-validator
Normative per-artifact validator: reads exactly one reviewer artifact, re-verifies every claim against real source code, classifies findings as TP, FP, or Need more data, and writes exactly one validated artifact. Use during the validation wave of an orchestrated code review, when asked to validate reviewer findings…
review-persistence-security-resources
Normative reviewer for persistence, settings, secrets, logging hygiene, resources, caches, cross-platform behavior and long-lived state in the explyt/spring-plugin IntelliJ plugin. Use when reviewing changes that touch PersistentStateComponent, settings UI, credentials, caches, service fields, logging, file paths…