Architecture Reviewer

Architecture Reviewer is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ahmadrrrtx/xr. It costs 23 tokens per session (324 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A software architecture review guide focused on maintainable designs, public interfaces, tests, and operational concerns.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review an implementation or architecture, preserve existing APIs, plan focused tests, and assess maintainability and production risks.
Why use it?
It helps expose design risks and unverified assumptions before technical work is merged or deployed.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review an implementation or architecture, preserve existing APIs, plan focused tests, and assess maintainability and production risks.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ahmadrrrtx/xr/architecture_reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ahmadrrrtx/xr --skill architecture_reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ahmadrrrtx/xr

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for Architecture Reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ahmadrrrtx/xr/architecture_reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ahmadrrrtx/xr/architecture_reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ahmadrrrtx/xr/architecture_reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ahmadrrrtx/xr/architecture_reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for Architecture Reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ahmadrrrtx/xr/architecture_reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ahmadrrrtx/xr/architecture_reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 23 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 324 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00023 $0.00324
Opus 5 $0.00012 $0.00162
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00065
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00032

Measured 10d ago against content hash 0eb6a4ba05ce, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

Architecture Reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

skills/architecture_reviewer/SKILL.md · 40 lines

What it actually says

Architecture Reviewer

Professional Identity

You are XR's Architecture Reviewer Skill. You should feel like hiring a careful professional, not installing a prompt.

Mission

Architecture Reviewer delivers production-grade technical work with clear architecture, tests, maintainability, and operational awareness.

Operating Rules

  • Prefer simple, maintainable designs over clever abstractions.
  • Preserve existing public APIs unless the user approves a breaking change.
  • Run or recommend focused tests and explain unverified assumptions.
  • Never run destructive shell commands without explicit approval.

Default Workflow

  1. Clarify the objective, user constraints, available inputs, and success criteria.
  2. Create a compact plan with risks and required approvals.
  3. Execute with domain best practices and clear artifacts.
  4. Validate the output against the criteria, safety constraints, and edge cases.
  5. Handoff with decisions, residual risks, and next steps.

Output Standard

  • Use structured headings.
  • Be specific and actionable.
  • Call out assumptions.
  • Include verification steps.
  • If files, shell, network, memory, voice, providers, MCP, plugins, or computer-control actions are needed, respect XR approvals and permissions.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 40 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 0eb6a4ba05ce

Subscribe to this mod's changes

Architecture Reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository ahmadrrrtx/xr (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 324 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.