Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add athola/claude-night-market --skill plugin-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/athola/claude-night-marketWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/athola/claude-night-market/plugin-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/athola/claude-night-market/plugin-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/athola/claude-night-market/plugin-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/athola/claude-night-market/plugin-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/athola/claude-night-market/plugin-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.01107 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00553 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00221 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
plugin-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 161 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Plugin Review
Overview
Tiered quality review of plugins with dependency-aware scoping.
When NOT To Use
- Reviewing one skill rather than a plugin (use
abstract:skills-eval) - Reviewing hooks (use
abstract:hooks-eval) - Tracing
Skill()references across plugins (useabstract:skill-graph-audit)
Table of Contents
- Tiers
- Orchestration
- Scope Detection
- Module Loading
- Verdict
- Output Format
- Quality Gate Mode
- Configuration
Tiers
| Tier | Trigger | Scope | Depth | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| branch | Default | Affected and related | Quick gates | ~2 min |
| pr | Before merge | Affected and related | Standard | ~5 min |
| release | Before version bump | All 17 plugins | Full | ~15 min |
Orchestration
- Detect scope: parse
--tierflag, find affected plugins from git diff, resolve related plugins fromdocs/plugin-dependencies.json - Plan: build check matrix (tier x plugin x role)
- Execute: run checks per tier definition
- Report: per-plugin table, aggregate verdict
Scope Detection
Affected plugins: git diff main --name-only filtered to
plugins/*/.
Related plugins: load docs/plugin-dependencies.json,
look up each affected plugin's reverse index to find
dependents. Mark as "related" (lighter checks).
If --tier release or no git diff available, scope to
all plugins.
Module Loading
- Always: this SKILL.md (orchestration logic)
- branch tier: load
modules/tier-branch.md - pr tier: load
modules/tier-branch.mdthenmodules/tier-pr.md - release tier: load all tier modules plus
modules/tier-release.md - When resolving deps: load
modules/dependency-detection.md
Verdict
| Result | Meaning |
|---|---|
| PASS | All checks green |
| PASS-WITH-WARNINGS | Non-blocking issues |
| FAIL | Blocking issues found |
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 161 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 6c4bd1b21da3
plugin-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository athola/claude-night-market (337 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 1,107 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review-architecture
Architecture-focused code review covering hexagonal boundary violations, DDD anti-patterns, CQRS misuse, and microservices coupling issues. Applied in addition to the language-specific review skill when architecture markers are detected. Invoked when reviewing hexagonal architectures, DDD patterns, or microservices…
code-review
Orchestrates code review by detecting the project language and architecture, then routing to the appropriate specialized review skill (code-review-go, code-review-typescript, code-review-python, code-review-php, code-review-architecture). Falls back to the generic checklist when no specific skill applies. Invoked when…
code-review-go
Deep Go-specific code review covering goroutine lifecycle, data races, error wrapping, domain modeling, and interface design. Applied in addition to the generic code-review skill when Go code is detected. Invoked when reviewing Go PRs, Go code changes, or performing Go-specific quality checks.
code-review-php
Deep PHP-specific code review covering strict types, PHPStan compliance, PSR standards, domain modeling, and ORM boundary violations. Applied in addition to the generic code-review skill when PHP code is detected. Invoked when reviewing PHP PRs, Symfony/Laravel changes, or performing PHP-specific quality checks.
code-review-python
Deep Python-specific code review covering type annotations, async pitfalls, mutable defaults, threading safety, and domain modeling. Applied in addition to the generic code-review skill when Python code is detected. Invoked when reviewing Python PRs, Py changes, or performing Python-specific quality checks.
code-review-typescript
Deep TypeScript-specific code review covering type safety, ESM/CJS, async correctness, money precision, and domain modeling. Applied in addition to the generic code-review skill when TypeScript/JavaScript code is detected. Invoked when reviewing TS/JS PRs, TypeScript changes, or performing TypeScript-specific quality…