Row-Bot is a local-first desktop AI assistant that combines language models with memory and tools for working across files, repositories, workflows, and communication channels. It is intended for people who want an assistant that can run locally while keeping application data on their machine.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add siddsachar/row-bot --skill developer_reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/siddsachar/row-botWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/siddsachar/row-bot/developer_review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/siddsachar/row-bot/developer_review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/siddsachar/row-bot/developer_review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/siddsachar/row-bot/developer_review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/siddsachar/row-bot/developer_review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00202 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00081 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00040 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
developer_review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 19d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Developer Review
Use this skill when the user asks for a code review, PR review, or risk assessment in a conversation's code folder.
Prioritize findings over summaries:
- Inspect workspace identity, branch, dirty state, and changed files.
- Read relevant diffs and implementation files.
- Look for correctness bugs, regressions, data loss, security issues, concurrency hazards, and missing tests.
- Run or recommend focused tests where useful.
- Report findings first with file paths and line references when possible. If no issues are found, say so clearly and mention residual risk.
Do not rewrite code during a review unless the user asks for fixes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 19d ago Changed · +4 tokens per session e01d4fdf0866
- 1mo ago First seen · 30 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 0e21075762a2
developer_review is a skill published in the GitHub repository siddsachar/row-bot (1,632 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 202 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
A code-review checklist for examining code without rewriting it. It checks correctness, security, readability and performance, then labels findings by seriousness.
Architecture Reviewer
Architecture Reviewer delivers production-grade technical work with clear architecture, tests, maintainability, and operational awareness.
code-review
Review a diff, file set, or current project changes for correctness, security, performance, reliability, and maintainability. Use project evidence, prioritize actionable findings, and report only unless the user explicitly asks for fixes.
ts-style-review
Review TypeScript code against the Google TypeScript Style Guide plus team conventions. Use when reviewing TS code for style, naming, imports, type usage, or quality.
dev5-review
Review implemented code for quality, correctness, and style. Produces review comments and creates a commit. Sub-skill of the /dev workflow.
dev7-pr
Create a PR, push to GitHub, wait for Greptile review, address comments, and push final. Sub-skill of the /dev workflow.