Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ahmadvh/octochains --skill tech-debt-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ahmadvh/octochainsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ahmadvh/octochains/tech-debt-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ahmadvh/octochains/tech-debt-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ahmadvh/octochains/tech-debt-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ahmadvh/octochains/tech-debt-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ahmadvh/octochains/tech-debt-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00261 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00130 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00052 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
tech-debt-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 23 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 77f59f30703d
tech-debt-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository ahmadvh/octochains (372 stars, last pushed 22d ago), with no licence file. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 261 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
coordinate-review
Review a Coordinate Agents implementation as the Codex Reviewer. Verify the real commit, diff, tests, validation evidence, and specification without modifying the Implementer's product code.
grasp
Build a walkthrough the user works through until they can pass a quiz on it. Use when the user needs to understand something deeply and be quizzed on it.
judge
One committed verdict on something that exists, cited. Use when something exists and a claim about it needs a verdict.
review
Use when reviewing a staged diff or a commit range for soundness against the project's taste rules, including a pre-commit pass or an explicit "sound review".
review
Code review skill covering security, correctness, type safety, and maintainability for any software project.
review-board
Run the multi-wave Software Engineering Review Board (SERB) over a proposed plan before execution. A read-only board of specialist agents gathers ground truth, critiques from architecture/testing/security/devops/quality lenses, then synthesizes a refined, executable plan with a go/no-go. Use for high-stakes or…