A structured code-review process that checks software changes for security, correctness, type safety, performance, maintainability, project conventions, and test coverage.

Use it to review pull requests or other code changes and write clear, actionable feedback.

It helps reviewers find bugs, security risks, and hard-to-maintain code before changes are accepted.

review — Skill for Claude Code by mnzralee

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent

npx skills add mnzralee/claude-multi-agent-architecture --skill review

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mnzralee/claude-multi-agent-architecture

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install claude-multi-agent-architecture, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 18 skills, 19 agents, 3 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mnzralee/claude-multi-agent-architecture/review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mnzralee/claude-multi-agent-architecture/review)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mnzralee/claude-multi-agent-architecture/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mnzralee/claude-multi-agent-architecture/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mnzralee/claude-multi-agent-architecture/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mnzralee/claude-multi-agent-architecture/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 20 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.

When invoked 1,471 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00020	$0.01471
Opus 5	$0.00010	$0.00736
Sonnet 5	$0.00004	$0.00294
Haiku 4.5	$0.00002	$0.00147

Measured 12d ago against content hash e94bfc0877cd, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/review/SKILL.md · 266 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 266 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Review Skill

Review code changes following enterprise-grade engineering standards. The checklists, comment templates, and command patterns here apply to any software project regardless of stack (examples use TypeScript / Node / React; the discipline is stack-agnostic).

Review Process

Understand the change - Read the PR description and commits
Check for issues - Security, bugs, performance, maintainability
Verify patterns - Ensure code follows project conventions
Test coverage - Check if tests cover the changes
Provide feedback - Clear, actionable comments

Review Checklist by Area

Security (CRITICAL)

No hardcoded secrets, passwords, or API keys
Input validation on all user inputs
SQL injection prevention (parameterized queries)
XSS prevention (output encoding)
Authentication checks on protected endpoints
Authorization checks (role-based access)
No sensitive data in logs
Secure error messages (no stack traces to client)

TypeScript/JavaScript

No any types - use proper type definitions
No unused variables or imports
Async/await error handling (try/catch)
No console.log in production code
Proper null/undefined checks
No hardcoded strings (use constants)

React/Frontend

Components follow naming convention (PascalCase)
Hooks follow rules (no conditional hooks)
Loading states handled
Error states handled
Empty states handled
Form validation implemented
Accessibility (ARIA labels, keyboard nav)
Responsive design verified
Error handling uses the project's centralized error module
API routes use the shared error handler utility, not inline ad-hoc error construction
Components use the project's API call wrapper, never raw new Error(message) directly
Error messages come from the project's error-code registry, no duplicated message strings
Form errors use the shared form-error handler for consistent toast and field display

Read the full file on GitHub · 266 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

12d ago First seen · 266 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A e94bfc0877cd

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a skill published in the GitHub repository mnzralee/claude-multi-agent-architecture (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 1,471 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Claude Code Code review agentic-workflow multi-agent-systems software-engineering

coordinate-review

Review a Coordinate Agents implementation as the Codex Reviewer. Verify the real commit, diff, tests, validation evidence, and specification without modifying the Implementer's product code.

hogancv/coordinate-agents · 36 tokens

tech-debt-audit

Audits architectural choices for hidden scalability bottlenecks and operational tech debt.

ahmadvh/octochains · 21 tokens

reviewer-openaccp

Perform read-only OpenACCP sidecar review of a task card, branch, diff, handoff, prompt, or status artifact. Use to check scope compliance, correctness, verification evidence, side effects, overclaiming, and readiness for final-authority consume.

0fuk/OpenACCP · 59 tokens

agent-code-review-swarm

Agent skill for code-review-swarm - invoke with $agent-code-review-swarm.

ruvnet/ruflo · 22 tokens

revdiff

Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…

umputun/revdiff · 248 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens