Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst-plugin --skill experiment-briefgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst-plugin/experiment-brief)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst-plugin/experiment-brief"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst-plugin/experiment-brief/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst-plugin/experiment-brief"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst-plugin/experiment-brief.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 5 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 59 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 95 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 106 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 106 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 207 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00091 | $0.02572 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.01286 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00514 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00257 |
Grade A, and why
experiment-brief scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 208 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill: Experiment Brief
Purpose
Auto-generate a structured experiment brief when a user expresses intent to test something. This is the "think before you design" safety net — ensuring every experiment starts with a clear hypothesis, north star metric, guardrail metrics, success criteria, and duration estimate before the Experiment Designer agent runs.
When to Use
Apply this skill when:
- The user says "I want to test..." or "Let's experiment with..." or "Should we A/B test..." or any variant expressing intent to run an experiment
- Before invoking the Experiment Designer agent — the brief is a prerequisite input
- When an experiment request is vague — the user wants to test something but hasn't specified metrics, duration, or success criteria
This skill auto-fires on experiment intent detection. Do NOT wait to be asked.
Critical Requirements
The brief must be COMPLETE and ACTIONABLE:
- No "TBD" placeholders — all decisions are made in the brief
- No "Would you like me to..." deferral — do the work now
- No missing thresholds — every guardrail has a number
- No ambiguous success criteria — ship/kill/iterate conditions are specific
- Always includes a VIABLE/MARGINAL/NOT_VIABLE feasibility flag
If the user provides baseline values, VALIDATE them by querying the data first. Correct misstatements with actual numbers before using them in the brief.
Instructions
What Is an Experiment Brief?
An experiment brief is a one-page document that captures the essential decisions BEFORE any statistical design work begins. It answers: What are we testing? Why? How will we know if it worked? What must we not break?
EXPERIMENT BRIEF
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
WHAT: What change are we testing?
WHY: What business outcome do we expect?
HYPOTHESIS: We believe [change] will [impact metric] because [reason]
NORTH STAR: The ONE metric we're trying to move
GUARDRAILS: Metrics that must NOT degrade
SUCCESS: What result would make us ship?
DURATION: Rough estimate of how long we'd need to run
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 208 lines · 91 tokens per session scan A 74ff2e74ac6c
experiment-brief is a skill published in the GitHub repository ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst-plugin (32 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 91 tokens to every session and 2,572 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…
chronicle
Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting…