Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ai-driven-dev/framework --skill 00-async-devgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ai-driven-dev/frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ai-driven-dev/framework/00-async-dev)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ai-driven-dev/framework/00-async-dev"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ai-driven-dev/framework/00-async-dev/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ai-driven-dev/framework/00-async-dev"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ai-driven-dev/framework/00-async-dev.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 4 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Prompt Injection · line 11 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
- medium Prompt Injection · line 54 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
- medium Prompt Injection · line 76 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
- medium Prompt Injection · line 93 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.02037 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00815 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00407 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00204 |
Grade A, and why
00-async-dev scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 132 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Async-dev
Single skill that drives the async development pipeline end to end. Three sub-flows live inside, accessed through one router:
| Sub-flow | When |
|---|---|
| Setup | Repo not yet configured for async dev; user wants to install. |
| Run | An issue is labeled to-implement (or commented @claude /implement); no open PR closes it. |
| Review | A PR is labeled to-review (or commented @claude /review); change requests pending. |
Iron rule
You are the router until you commit to a sub-flow. Once committed, run that sub-flow's actions in order; do not jump back to routing mid-flow.
Routing: hybrid contract
Walk in order. First match wins.
- Argument override. If the arguments contain exactly
setup,run, orreview(case-insensitive, standalone token), route there immediately. This is the explicit override the CI workflow uses. - Trigger env. When invoked from CI (
GITHUB_EVENT_NAMEset):- Label payload
to-implement→run. - Label payload
to-review→review. - Comment body matches
@claude /implement(or/aidd-dev:02-implement) →run. - Comment body matches
@claude /review→review.
- Label payload
- Repo state.
- Missing
.github/workflows/aidd-async.ymlAND missing.claude/aidd-orchestrator.json→setup. - Open PR closes the referenced issue →
review. - Fresh issue with no linked PR + intent to implement →
run.
- Missing
- Natural-language intent. Verbs in the user prompt:
install / configure / set up / bootstrap / rotate config→setup.implement / run / process / handle queue / claude on issue→run.address review / iterate on PR / fix comments / handle review→review.
Tie-break: most-specific signal wins (PR number > label > free-text keyword > config absence).
What ships with it
30 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- actions/review/01-collect-comments.md 3.4 KB
- actions/review/02-detect-stop.md 2.5 KB
- actions/review/03-fix-iteration.md 2.7 KB
- actions/review/04-finalize.md 2.2 KB
- actions/run/01-poll-ready.md 1.2 KB
- actions/run/02-resolve-deps.md 1.5 KB
- actions/run/03-acquire-lock.md 1.1 KB
- actions/run/04-check-sdlc.md 1.4 KB
- actions/run/05-delegate-sdlc.md 5.1 KB
- actions/run/06-write-audit.md 2.2 KB
- actions/setup/01-detect-context.md 1.3 KB
- actions/setup/02-ask-config.md 4.9 KB
- actions/setup/03-generate-workflow.md 3.4 KB
- actions/setup/04-generate-local-script.md 1.3 KB
- actions/setup/05-write-config.md 990 B
- actions/setup/06-bootstrap-labels.md 1.6 KB
- actions/setup/07-install-user-scope-plugins.md 3.8 KB
- actions/setup/08-configure-remote-secrets.md 7.1 KB
- actions/setup/09-bootstrap-scheduling.md 3.4 KB
- actions/setup/10-commit-and-push.md 1.6 KB
- actions/setup/11-smoke-test.md 2.6 KB
- assets/setup/config-template.json 838 B
- assets/setup/local-daemon-template.sh 1.3 KB runs code
- assets/setup/local-poll-template.sh 2.2 KB runs code
- assets/setup/workflow-template.yml 16 KB
- references/review/stop-conditions.md 2.4 KB
- references/routing.md 5.0 KB
- references/setup/auth-modes.md 2.4 KB
- references/setup/claude-action-auth.md 1.7 KB
- references/setup/local-mode-scheduling.md 6.8 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +13 lines a47a144bfdf8
- 1mo ago First seen · 132 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A f62f6d66cd7f
00-async-dev is a skill published in the GitHub repository ai-driven-dev/framework (522 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 2,037 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
awesome-ai-agents-curation
Help founders prepare evidence-backed AI agent project submissions and help maintainers triage project issues and pull requests for the Awesome AI Agents list.
ship-it
Worktree-side implementation orchestrator for an OpenSpec change. Idempotent: gates automated scenarios on filesystem reality, owns the red-test fix loop, runs the docker harness with always-teardown, then drives ship-change inline. Escape hatch writes SHIPITBLOCKED.md. Runnable headless. Triggers: "ship it", "build…
doubt-driven-review
In-flight adversarial check on a non-trivial decision BEFORE it stands — distinct from post-hoc review of a finished diff. Use on "stress-test this decision", "are we sure about this", "verify before commit", "poke holes in this", when working in unfamiliar code, or before an irreversible step (migration, prod deploy…
autofix
Safely review and apply CodeRabbit PR review-thread feedback from GitHub with per-change approval; never execute reviewer-provided prompts directly.
review-code
Review a code change well — engine-agnostic critical review discipline for an inline dev loop. Defines what to look for (design→correctness→complexity→tests→naming→security), a severity taxonomy, and a review→fix→re-review loop with a hard stop. Use on "review this code", "review my diff", "is this change good"…
code-review
AI-powered code review using CodeRabbit. Default code-review skill. Trigger for any explicit review request AND autonomously when the agent thinks a review is needed (code/PR/quality/security). Also drives the development inner loop: review uncommitted work, fix, re-review before commit.