Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to aiblueprinthq/ai-blueprint. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aiblueprinthq/ai-blueprint/main/.agents/skills/audit/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aiblueprinthq/ai-blueprintWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aiblueprinthq/ai-blueprint/audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aiblueprinthq/ai-blueprint/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aiblueprinthq/ai-blueprint/audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aiblueprinthq/ai-blueprint/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aiblueprinthq/ai-blueprint/audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.05550 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.02775 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01110 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00555 |
Grade A, and why
audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 467 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
audit - review code quality against the project standards
Context reuse: Reuse any required file already loaded in project instructions or the current session. Read it again only if absent, changed, or exact current bytes or line references are needed.
First action: Before project inspection, preflight, or any other tool call,
publish running to blueprint/.state/run.json using the dashboard activity
contract in AGENTS.md.
Where this sits in the workflow:
/implement or /autopilot -> [audit] -> fixes or /complete
(code exists) (review + (repair quality issues
ledger) or close the feature)
/check proves behavior against the spec. /doctor checks Blueprint setup and
workflow health. This skill checks the code itself through either a broad review
or one focused lens: quality, security, performance, or tests.
It reviews code without changing it: it never edits source files, installs
dependencies, commits, merges, pushes, or starts product work. A normal audit's
one write is the findings ledger at blueprint/context/findings.md (Step 4),
the durable record of findings and their status. Independent mode may also
write blueprint/context/review.md using the exact record contract in
reference/independent-review.md.
The quality-gate config controls when another workflow invokes this skill
automatically. An explicit /audit or $audit request always selects the audit
regardless of whether the applicable gate is manual, conditional, or always.
A selected independentReview gate invokes independent mode instead of letting
the builder satisfy its own review. When both audit and independent review are
selected, one passing independent review satisfies the audit gate.
A missing config means built-in defaults. If it exists but is invalid, stop and
point to /doctor before writing the findings ledger.
Input
Treat scope and lens as separate controls. Arguments may appear in either order,
such as /audit security current or /audit src/auth tests.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · +22 lines 32b80ae96a28
- 5d ago Changed · +41 lines f4cd9e167b9f
- 8d ago Changed · +117 lines · -37 tokens per session a26020c4fa1d
- 12d ago First seen · 287 lines · 102 tokens per session scan A 9a92c824cd37
audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository aiblueprinthq/ai-blueprint (399 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 5,550 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…