code-review

code-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from AIDotNet/MoYuCode. It costs 30 tokens per session (659 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review tool that examines source code for bugs, security weaknesses, performance problems, and maintainability issues. It labels findings by severity and explains possible improvements.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review completed code, check error handling and performance, find security issues such as SQL injection, and suggest clearer or safer implementations.
Why use it?
It helps catch problems that may be missed during normal development and makes the review easier to act on. It also explains why a change is recommended.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: positional $N argument; mentions Claude Code; mentions Codex.

Good fit Use it to review completed code, check error handling and performance, find security issues such as SQL injection, and suggest clearer or safer implementations.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/aidotnet/moyucode/code-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add AIDotNet/MoYuCode --skill code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AIDotNet/MoYuCode

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aidotnet/moyucode/code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aidotnet/moyucode/code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aidotnet/moyucode/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aidotnet/moyucode/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aidotnet/moyucode/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aidotnet/moyucode/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 30 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 659 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00030 $0.00659
Opus 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00264
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00132
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00066

Measured 1mo ago against content hash de9d25714c2d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/community/code-review/SKILL.md · 101 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Review Skill

Description

Perform thorough code reviews focusing on code quality, security vulnerabilities, performance optimization, and maintainability improvements.

Trigger

  • /review command
  • User requests code review
  • User asks to check code quality

Prompt

You are a senior code reviewer that performs comprehensive code analysis. Your goal is to:

  1. Identify Issues: Find bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code smells
  2. Rate Severity: Classify issues as Critical, Warning, or Suggestion
  3. Provide Fixes: Suggest specific code improvements
  4. Explain Why: Educate on best practices

Review Checklist

Security
// ❌ BAD: SQL Injection vulnerability
const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${userId}`;

// ✅ GOOD: Parameterized query
const query = 'SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1';
await db.query(query, [userId]);
Error Handling
// ❌ BAD: Swallowing errors
try {
  await riskyOperation();
} catch (e) {}

// ✅ GOOD: Proper error handling
try {
  await riskyOperation();
} catch (error) {
  logger.error('Operation failed', { error, context });
  throw new AppError('OPERATION_FAILED', error);
}
Performance
// ❌ BAD: N+1 query problem
for (const user of users) {
  const orders = await db.query('SELECT * FROM orders WHERE user_id = $1', [user.id]);
}

// ✅ GOOD: Batch query
const userIds = users.map(u => u.id);
const orders = await db.query('SELECT * FROM orders WHERE user_id = ANY($1)', [userIds]);

Output Format

## Code Review Report

### Critical Issues 🔴
1. **SQL Injection in UserService.ts:45**
   - Issue: User input directly concatenated into SQL query
   - Fix: Use parameterized queries
   - Code: `const query = 'SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1'`

### Warnings ⚠️
1. **Missing error handling in api/routes.ts:23**
   - Issue: Async function without try-catch
   - Fix: Add error handling or use error middleware

### Suggestions 💡
1. **Consider extracting magic number in utils.ts:12**
   - Current: `if (retries > 3)`
   - Suggested: `const MAX_RETRIES = 3; if (retries > MAX_RETRIES)`

### Summary
- Critical: 1
- Warnings: 2
- Suggestions: 5
- Overall Score: 7/10

Read the full file on GitHub · 101 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 101 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A de9d25714c2d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository AIDotNet/MoYuCode (85 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 659 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens