Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/airvalona/antigravity-like-claude-code/code-reviewnpx skills add airvalona/antigravity-like-claude-code --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/airvalona/antigravity-like-claude-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/airvalona/antigravity-like-claude-code/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/airvalona/antigravity-like-claude-code/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/airvalona/antigravity-like-claude-code/code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.00531 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00266 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00106 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/code-review — Diff & Bug Review
Port of Claude Code's /code-review. Runs a structured review pass, distinct from
simplify (cleanup-only) and security-review (security-only).
Arguments
/code-review— review the current uncommitted diff./code-review <target>— review a specific file, folder, or PR number/branch./code-review high/low— adjust thoroughness (see Effort below)./code-review --fix— after reporting, apply the fixes directly.
Steps
-
Get the diff. Run
git diff(orgit diff <base>...<branch>for a PR-style review) if no explicit target was given. If a target file/folder was given, read it in full instead. -
Review checklist — go through each in order, only reporting genuine findings:
- Correctness: logic errors, off-by-one, unhandled edge cases, race conditions
- Security: injection risks, exposed secrets, unsafe deserialization, auth gaps
- Performance: obvious inefficiencies, N+1 patterns, unnecessary re-renders/loops
- Test coverage: missing tests for new branches/edge cases
- Readability/maintainability: naming, duplication, dead code
-
Effort levels
low: correctness + security only, skip style commentary- default: all five checklist items, moderate depth
high: all five, plus trace through call sites of changed functions to check for downstream breakage
-
Report format — group findings by severity (Blocking / Should Fix / Nit), each with file:line, a one-line explanation, and a suggested fix. Do not pad the report with praise for unchanged code.
-
If
--fixwas passed: apply the Blocking and Should Fix items directly as edits, then summarize what was changed. Leave Nits for the user to decide on.
Notes
This is a review, not a rewrite — don't restructure code beyond what's needed to fix a specific finding.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 46 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 3d0033531852
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository airvalona/antigravity-like-claude-code (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 531 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
chronicle
Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…