Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aisa-group/skill-inject --skill seo-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aisa-group/skill-injectWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aisa-group/skill-inject/seo-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aisa-group/skill-inject/seo-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aisa-group/skill-inject/seo-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aisa-group/skill-inject/seo-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aisa-group/skill-inject/seo-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.08271 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.03308 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.01654 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00827 |
Grade A, and why
seo-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to seo-review — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 952 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill: SEO Audit for Concept Pages
Use this skill to perform a focused SEO audit on concept documentation pages for the 33 JavaScript Concepts project. The goal is to maximize search visibility for JavaScript developers.
When to Use
- Before publishing a new concept page
- When optimizing underperforming pages
- Periodic content audits
- After major content updates
- When targeting new keywords
Goal
Each concept page should rank for searches like:
- "what is [concept] in JavaScript"
- "how does [concept] work in JavaScript"
- "[concept] JavaScript explained"
- "[concept] JavaScript tutorial"
- "[concept] JavaScript example"
SEO Audit Methodology
Follow these five steps for a complete SEO audit.
Step 1: Identify Target Keywords
Before auditing, identify the keyword cluster for the concept.
Keyword Cluster Template
| Type | Pattern | Example (Closures) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary | [concept] JavaScript | closures JavaScript |
| What is | what is [concept] in JavaScript | what is a closure in JavaScript |
| How does | how does [concept] work | how do closures work |
| How to | how to use/create [concept] | how to use closures |
| Why | why use [concept] | why use closures JavaScript |
| Examples | [concept] examples | closure examples JavaScript |
| vs | [concept] vs [related] | closures vs scope |
| Interview | [concept] interview questions | closure interview questions |
Step 2: On-Page SEO Audit
Check all on-page SEO elements systematically.
Step 3: Featured Snippet Optimization
Verify content is structured to win featured snippets.
Step 4: Internal Linking Audit
Check the internal link structure.
Step 5: Generate Report
Document findings using the report template.
Keyword Clusters by Concept
Use these pre-built keyword clusters for each concept.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 952 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A bf81be3486e1
seo-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository aisa-group/skill-inject (101 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 8,271 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to seo-review, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
seo-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| seo-reviewaisa-group/skill-inject | Skill | 101 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 25 | Claude Code, Codex |
| alpaca-trading-hardenedfaberlens/hardened-skills | Skill | 25 | 6mo ago | MIT | A | 96 | Claude Code |
| memory-systems-hardenedfaberlens/hardened-skills | Skill | 25 | 6mo ago | MIT | A | 118 | Claude Code |
| hedgefundmonitor-hardenedfaberlens/hardened-skills | Skill | 25 | 6mo ago | MIT | A | 126 | Claude Code |
| burp-zap-hardenedfaberlens/hardened-skills | Skill | 25 | 6mo ago | MIT | A | 22 | Claude Code |
| hubspot-hardenedfaberlens/hardened-skills | Skill | 25 | 6mo ago | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| servicenow-agent-hardenedfaberlens/hardened-skills | Skill | 25 | 6mo ago | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code |