Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts --skill causal-inferencegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aj-geddes/useful-ai-promptsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/causal-inference)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/causal-inference"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/causal-inference/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/causal-inference"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/causal-inference.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.02940 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01470 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00588 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00294 |
Grade A, and why
Causal Inference scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 302 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Causal Inference
Overview
Causal inference determines cause-and-effect relationships and estimates treatment effects, going beyond correlation to understand what causes what.
When to Use
- Evaluating the impact of policy interventions or business decisions
- Estimating treatment effects when randomized experiments aren't feasible
- Controlling for confounding variables in observational data
- Determining if a marketing campaign or product change caused an outcome
- Analyzing heterogeneous treatment effects across different user segments
- Making causal claims from non-experimental data using propensity scores or instrumental variables
Key Concepts
- Treatment: Intervention or exposure
- Outcome: Result or consequence
- Confounding: Variables affecting both treatment and outcome
- Causal Graph: Visual representation of relationships
- Treatment Effect: Impact of intervention
- Selection Bias: Non-random treatment assignment
Causal Methods
- Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT): Gold standard
- Propensity Score Matching: Balance treatment/control
- Difference-in-Differences: Before/after comparison
- Instrumental Variables: Handle endogeneity
- Causal Forests: Heterogeneous treatment effects
Implementation with Python
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
from sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression, LogisticRegression
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from scipy import stats
# Generate observational data with confounding
np.random.seed(42)
n = 1000
# Confounder: Age (affects both treatment and outcome)
age = np.random.uniform(25, 75, n)
# Treatment: Training program (more likely for younger people)
treatment_prob = 0.3 + 0.3 * (75 - age) / 50 # Inverse relationship with age
treatment = (np.random.uniform(0, 1, n) < treatment_prob).astype(int)
# Outcome: Salary (affected by both treatment and age)
# True causal effect of treatment: +$5000
salary = 40000 + 500 * age + 5000 * treatment + np.random.normal(0, 10000, n)
df = pd.DataFrame({
'age': age,
'treatment': treatment,
'salary': salary,
})
print("Observational Data Summary:")
print(df.describe())
print(f"\nTreatment Rate: {df['treatment'].mean():.1%}")
print(f"Average Salary (Control): ${df[df['treatment']==0]['salary'].mean():.0f}")
print(f"Average Salary (Treatment): ${df[df['treatment']==1]['salary'].mean():.0f}")
# 1. Naive Comparison (BIASED - ignores confounding)
naive_effect = df[df['treatment']==1]['salary'].mean() - df[df['treatment']==0]['salary'].mean()
print(f"\n1. Naive Comparison: ${naive_effect:.0f} (BIASED)")
# 2. Regression Adjustment (Covariate Adjustment)
X = df[['treatment', 'age']]
y = df['salary']
model = LinearRegression()
model.fit(X, y)
regression_effect = model.coef_[0]
print(f"\n2. Regression Adjustment: ${regression_effect:.0f}")
# 3. Propensity Score Matching
# Estimate probability of treatment given covariates
ps_model = LogisticRegression()
ps_model.fit(df[['age']], df['treatment'])
df['propensity_score'] = ps_model.predict_proba(df[['age']])[:, 1]
print(f"\n3. Propensity Score Matching:")
print(f"PS range: [{df['propensity_score'].min():.3f}, {df['propensity_score'].max():.3f}]")
# Matching: find control for each treated unit
matched_pairs = []
treated_units = df[df['treatment'] == 1].index
for treated_idx in treated_units:
treated_ps = df.loc[treated_idx, 'propensity_score']
treated_age = df.loc[treated_idx, 'age']
# Find closest control unit
control_units = df[(df['treatment'] == 0) &
(df['propensity_score'] >= treated_ps - 0.1) &
(df['propensity_score'] <= treated_ps + 0.1)].index
if len(control_units) > 0:
closest_control = min(control_units,
key=lambda x: abs(df.loc[x, 'propensity_score'] - treated_ps))
matched_pairs.append({
'treated_idx': treated_idx,
'control_idx': closest_control,
'treated_salary': df.loc[treated_idx, 'salary'],
'control_salary': df.loc[closest_control, 'salary'],
})
matched_df = pd.DataFrame(matched_pairs)
psm_effect = (matched_df['treated_salary'] - matched_df['control_salary']).mean()
print(f"PSM Effect: ${psm_effect:.0f}")
print(f"Matched pairs: {len(matched_df)}")
# 4. Stratification by Propensity Score
df['ps_stratum'] = pd.qcut(df['propensity_score'], q=5, labels=False, duplicates='drop')
stratified_effects = []
for stratum in df['ps_stratum'].unique():
stratum_data = df[df['ps_stratum'] == stratum]
if (stratum_data['treatment'] == 0).sum() > 0 and (stratum_data['treatment'] == 1).sum() > 0:
treated_mean = stratum_data[stratum_data['treatment'] == 1]['salary'].mean()
control_mean = stratum_data[stratum_data['treatment'] == 0]['salary'].mean()
effect = treated_mean - control_mean
stratified_effects.append(effect)
stratified_effect = np.mean(stratified_effects)
print(f"\n4. Stratification by PS: ${stratified_effect:.0f}")
# 5. Visualization
fig, axes = plt.subplots(2, 2, figsize=(14, 10))
# Treatment distribution by age
ax = axes[0, 0]
treated = df[df['treatment'] == 1]
control = df[df['treatment'] == 0]
ax.hist(control['age'], bins=20, alpha=0.6, label='Control', color='blue')
ax.hist(treated['age'], bins=20, alpha=0.6, label='Treated', color='red')
ax.set_xlabel('Age')
ax.set_ylabel('Frequency')
ax.set_title('Age Distribution by Treatment')
ax.legend()
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3, axis='y')
# Salary vs Age (colored by treatment)
ax = axes[0, 1]
ax.scatter(control['age'], control['salary'], alpha=0.5, label='Control', s=30)
ax.scatter(treated['age'], treated['salary'], alpha=0.5, label='Treated', s=30, color='red')
ax.set_xlabel('Age')
ax.set_ylabel('Salary')
ax.set_title('Salary vs Age by Treatment')
ax.legend()
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
# Propensity Score Distribution
ax = axes[1, 0]
ax.hist(df[df['treatment'] == 0]['propensity_score'], bins=20, alpha=0.6, label='Control', color='blue')
ax.hist(df[df['treatment'] == 1]['propensity_score'], bins=20, alpha=0.6, label='Treated', color='red')
ax.set_xlabel('Propensity Score')
ax.set_ylabel('Frequency')
ax.set_title('Propensity Score Distribution')
ax.legend()
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3, axis='y')
# Treatment Effect Comparison
ax = axes[1, 1]
methods = ['Naive', 'Regression', 'PSM', 'Stratified']
effects = [naive_effect, regression_effect, psm_effect, stratified_effect]
true_effect = 5000
ax.bar(methods, effects, color=['red', 'orange', 'yellow', 'lightgreen'], alpha=0.7, edgecolor='black')
ax.axhline(y=true_effect, color='green', linestyle='--', linewidth=2, label=f'True Effect (${true_effect:.0f})')
ax.set_ylabel('Treatment Effect ($)')
ax.set_title('Treatment Effect Estimates by Method')
ax.legend()
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3, axis='y')
for i, effect in enumerate(effects):
ax.text(i, effect + 200, f'${effect:.0f}', ha='center', va='bottom')
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
# 6. Doubly Robust Estimation
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestRegressor
# Propensity score model
ps_model_dr = LogisticRegression().fit(df[['age']], df['treatment'])
ps_scores = ps_model_dr.predict_proba(df[['age']])[:, 1]
# Outcome model
outcome_model = RandomForestRegressor(n_estimators=50, random_state=42)
outcome_model.fit(df[['treatment', 'age']], df['salary'])
# Doubly robust estimator
treated_mask = df['treatment'] == 1
control_mask = df['treatment'] == 0
# Adjust for propensity score
treated_adjusted = (treated_mask.astype(int) * df['salary']) / (ps_scores + 0.01)
control_adjusted = (control_mask.astype(int) * df['salary']) / (1 - ps_scores + 0.01)
# Outcome predictions
pred_treated = outcome_model.predict(df[['treatment', 'age']].replace({'treatment': 0, 1: 1}))
pred_control = outcome_model.predict(df[['treatment', 'age']].replace({'treatment': 1, 0: 0}))
dr_effect = treated_adjusted.sum() / treated_mask.sum() - control_adjusted.sum() / control_mask.sum()
print(f"\n6. Doubly Robust Estimation: ${dr_effect:.0f}")
# 7. Heterogeneous Treatment Effects
print(f"\n7. Heterogeneous Treatment Effects (by Age Quartile):")
for age_q in pd.qcut(df['age'], q=4, duplicates='drop').unique():
mask = (df['age'] >= age_q.left) & (df['age'] < age_q.right)
stratum_data = df[mask]
if (stratum_data['treatment'] == 0).sum() > 0 and (stratum_data['treatment'] == 1).sum() > 0:
treated_mean = stratum_data[stratum_data['treatment'] == 1]['salary'].mean()
control_mean = stratum_data[stratum_data['treatment'] == 0]['salary'].mean()
effect = treated_mean - control_mean
print(f" Age {age_q.left:.0f}-{age_q.right:.0f}: ${effect:.0f}")
# 8. Sensitivity Analysis
print(f"\n8. Sensitivity Analysis (Hidden Confounder Impact):")
# Vary hidden confounder correlation with outcome
for hidden_effect in [1000, 2000, 5000, 10000]:
adjusted_effect = regression_effect - hidden_effect * 0.1
print(f" If hidden confounder worth ${hidden_effect}: Effect = ${adjusted_effect:.0f}")
# 9. Summary Table
print(f"\n" + "="*60)
print("CAUSAL INFERENCE SUMMARY")
print("="*60)
print(f"True Treatment Effect: ${true_effect:,.0f}")
print(f"\nEstimates:")
print(f" Naive (BIASED): ${naive_effect:,.0f}")
print(f" Regression Adjustment: ${regression_effect:,.0f}")
print(f" Propensity Score Matching: ${psm_effect:,.0f}")
print(f" Stratification: ${stratified_effect:,.0f}")
print(f" Doubly Robust: ${dr_effect:,.0f}")
print("="*60)
# 10. Causal Graph (Text representation)
print(f"\n10. Causal Graph (DAG):")
print(f"""
Age → Treatment ← (Selection Bias)
↓ ↓
└─→ Salary
Interpretation:
- Age is a confounder
- Treatment causally affects Salary
- Age directly affects Salary
- Age affects probability of Treatment
""")
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 302 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 8624416b5876
Causal Inference is a skill published in the GitHub repository aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts (338 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 2,940 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
instrument-data-to-allotrope
Convert laboratory instrument output files (PDF, CSV, Excel, TXT) to Allotrope Simple Model (ASM) JSON format or flattened 2D CSV. Use this skill when scientists need to standardize instrument data for LIMS systems, data lakes, or downstream analysis. Supports auto-detection of instrument types. Outputs include full…
exploratory-data-analysis
Perform bounded, local exploratory analysis of explicitly supported scientific files. Use for redacted CSV/TSV/JSON profiles; optional NumPy, HDF5, FASTA/FASTQ, and basic image metadata inspection; missingness/leakage audits; outlier and transformation sensitivity; and rigorous EDA report scaffolds. Other domain…
matlab
Build, review, migrate, and safely plan MATLAB or GNU Octave numerical workflows, including arrays, tabular/time data, tests, projects, graphics, MAT files, and explicit Python interoperability.
phylogenetics
Build and analyze phylogenetic trees using MAFFT (multiple alignment), IQ-TREE 2 (maximum likelihood), and FastTree (fast NJ/ML). Visualize with ETE3 or FigTree. For evolutionary analysis, microbial genomics, viral phylodynamics, protein family analysis, and molecular clock studies.
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
mapping-to-snomed
Maps clinical concept spans extracted by OpenMed to SNOMED CT concepts through a USER-SUPPLIED terminology server (the user's own Ontoserver, Snowstorm, or UMLS/UTS), never a bundled vocabulary. Use when the user wants to code findings, disorders, procedures, body structures, or substances to SNOMED CT, run an ECL…