Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts --skill causal-inferencegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aj-geddes/useful-ai-promptsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/causal-inference)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/causal-inference"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/causal-inference/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/causal-inference"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/causal-inference.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.02940 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01176 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00588 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00294 |
Grade A, and why
Causal Inference scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 302 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Causal Inference
Overview
Causal inference determines cause-and-effect relationships and estimates treatment effects, going beyond correlation to understand what causes what.
When to Use
- Evaluating the impact of policy interventions or business decisions
- Estimating treatment effects when randomized experiments aren't feasible
- Controlling for confounding variables in observational data
- Determining if a marketing campaign or product change caused an outcome
- Analyzing heterogeneous treatment effects across different user segments
- Making causal claims from non-experimental data using propensity scores or instrumental variables
Key Concepts
- Treatment: Intervention or exposure
- Outcome: Result or consequence
- Confounding: Variables affecting both treatment and outcome
- Causal Graph: Visual representation of relationships
- Treatment Effect: Impact of intervention
- Selection Bias: Non-random treatment assignment
Causal Methods
- Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT): Gold standard
- Propensity Score Matching: Balance treatment/control
- Difference-in-Differences: Before/after comparison
- Instrumental Variables: Handle endogeneity
- Causal Forests: Heterogeneous treatment effects
Implementation with Python
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
from sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression, LogisticRegression
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from scipy import stats
# Generate observational data with confounding
np.random.seed(42)
n = 1000
# Confounder: Age (affects both treatment and outcome)
age = np.random.uniform(25, 75, n)
# Treatment: Training program (more likely for younger people)
treatment_prob = 0.3 + 0.3 * (75 - age) / 50 # Inverse relationship with age
treatment = (np.random.uniform(0, 1, n) < treatment_prob).astype(int)
# Outcome: Salary (affected by both treatment and age)
# True causal effect of treatment: +$5000
salary = 40000 + 500 * age + 5000 * treatment + np.random.normal(0, 10000, n)
df = pd.DataFrame({
'age': age,
'treatment': treatment,
'salary': salary,
})
print("Observational Data Summary:")
print(df.describe())
print(f"\nTreatment Rate: {df['treatment'].mean():.1%}")
print(f"Average Salary (Control): ${df[df['treatment']==0]['salary'].mean():.0f}")
print(f"Average Salary (Treatment): ${df[df['treatment']==1]['salary'].mean():.0f}")
# 1. Naive Comparison (BIASED - ignores confounding)
naive_effect = df[df['treatment']==1]['salary'].mean() - df[df['treatment']==0]['salary'].mean()
print(f"\n1. Naive Comparison: ${naive_effect:.0f} (BIASED)")
# 2. Regression Adjustment (Covariate Adjustment)
X = df[['treatment', 'age']]
y = df['salary']
model = LinearRegression()
model.fit(X, y)
regression_effect = model.coef_[0]
print(f"\n2. Regression Adjustment: ${regression_effect:.0f}")
# 3. Propensity Score Matching
# Estimate probability of treatment given covariates
ps_model = LogisticRegression()
ps_model.fit(df[['age']], df['treatment'])
df['propensity_score'] = ps_model.predict_proba(df[['age']])[:, 1]
print(f"\n3. Propensity Score Matching:")
print(f"PS range: [{df['propensity_score'].min():.3f}, {df['propensity_score'].max():.3f}]")
# Matching: find control for each treated unit
matched_pairs = []
treated_units = df[df['treatment'] == 1].index
for treated_idx in treated_units:
treated_ps = df.loc[treated_idx, 'propensity_score']
treated_age = df.loc[treated_idx, 'age']
# Find closest control unit
control_units = df[(df['treatment'] == 0) &
(df['propensity_score'] >= treated_ps - 0.1) &
(df['propensity_score'] <= treated_ps + 0.1)].index
if len(control_units) > 0:
closest_control = min(control_units,
key=lambda x: abs(df.loc[x, 'propensity_score'] - treated_ps))
matched_pairs.append({
'treated_idx': treated_idx,
'control_idx': closest_control,
'treated_salary': df.loc[treated_idx, 'salary'],
'control_salary': df.loc[closest_control, 'salary'],
})
matched_df = pd.DataFrame(matched_pairs)
psm_effect = (matched_df['treated_salary'] - matched_df['control_salary']).mean()
print(f"PSM Effect: ${psm_effect:.0f}")
print(f"Matched pairs: {len(matched_df)}")
# 4. Stratification by Propensity Score
df['ps_stratum'] = pd.qcut(df['propensity_score'], q=5, labels=False, duplicates='drop')
stratified_effects = []
for stratum in df['ps_stratum'].unique():
stratum_data = df[df['ps_stratum'] == stratum]
if (stratum_data['treatment'] == 0).sum() > 0 and (stratum_data['treatment'] == 1).sum() > 0:
treated_mean = stratum_data[stratum_data['treatment'] == 1]['salary'].mean()
control_mean = stratum_data[stratum_data['treatment'] == 0]['salary'].mean()
effect = treated_mean - control_mean
stratified_effects.append(effect)
stratified_effect = np.mean(stratified_effects)
print(f"\n4. Stratification by PS: ${stratified_effect:.0f}")
# 5. Visualization
fig, axes = plt.subplots(2, 2, figsize=(14, 10))
# Treatment distribution by age
ax = axes[0, 0]
treated = df[df['treatment'] == 1]
control = df[df['treatment'] == 0]
ax.hist(control['age'], bins=20, alpha=0.6, label='Control', color='blue')
ax.hist(treated['age'], bins=20, alpha=0.6, label='Treated', color='red')
ax.set_xlabel('Age')
ax.set_ylabel('Frequency')
ax.set_title('Age Distribution by Treatment')
ax.legend()
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3, axis='y')
# Salary vs Age (colored by treatment)
ax = axes[0, 1]
ax.scatter(control['age'], control['salary'], alpha=0.5, label='Control', s=30)
ax.scatter(treated['age'], treated['salary'], alpha=0.5, label='Treated', s=30, color='red')
ax.set_xlabel('Age')
ax.set_ylabel('Salary')
ax.set_title('Salary vs Age by Treatment')
ax.legend()
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
# Propensity Score Distribution
ax = axes[1, 0]
ax.hist(df[df['treatment'] == 0]['propensity_score'], bins=20, alpha=0.6, label='Control', color='blue')
ax.hist(df[df['treatment'] == 1]['propensity_score'], bins=20, alpha=0.6, label='Treated', color='red')
ax.set_xlabel('Propensity Score')
ax.set_ylabel('Frequency')
ax.set_title('Propensity Score Distribution')
ax.legend()
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3, axis='y')
# Treatment Effect Comparison
ax = axes[1, 1]
methods = ['Naive', 'Regression', 'PSM', 'Stratified']
effects = [naive_effect, regression_effect, psm_effect, stratified_effect]
true_effect = 5000
ax.bar(methods, effects, color=['red', 'orange', 'yellow', 'lightgreen'], alpha=0.7, edgecolor='black')
ax.axhline(y=true_effect, color='green', linestyle='--', linewidth=2, label=f'True Effect (${true_effect:.0f})')
ax.set_ylabel('Treatment Effect ($)')
ax.set_title('Treatment Effect Estimates by Method')
ax.legend()
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3, axis='y')
for i, effect in enumerate(effects):
ax.text(i, effect + 200, f'${effect:.0f}', ha='center', va='bottom')
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
# 6. Doubly Robust Estimation
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestRegressor
# Propensity score model
ps_model_dr = LogisticRegression().fit(df[['age']], df['treatment'])
ps_scores = ps_model_dr.predict_proba(df[['age']])[:, 1]
# Outcome model
outcome_model = RandomForestRegressor(n_estimators=50, random_state=42)
outcome_model.fit(df[['treatment', 'age']], df['salary'])
# Doubly robust estimator
treated_mask = df['treatment'] == 1
control_mask = df['treatment'] == 0
# Adjust for propensity score
treated_adjusted = (treated_mask.astype(int) * df['salary']) / (ps_scores + 0.01)
control_adjusted = (control_mask.astype(int) * df['salary']) / (1 - ps_scores + 0.01)
# Outcome predictions
pred_treated = outcome_model.predict(df[['treatment', 'age']].replace({'treatment': 0, 1: 1}))
pred_control = outcome_model.predict(df[['treatment', 'age']].replace({'treatment': 1, 0: 0}))
dr_effect = treated_adjusted.sum() / treated_mask.sum() - control_adjusted.sum() / control_mask.sum()
print(f"\n6. Doubly Robust Estimation: ${dr_effect:.0f}")
# 7. Heterogeneous Treatment Effects
print(f"\n7. Heterogeneous Treatment Effects (by Age Quartile):")
for age_q in pd.qcut(df['age'], q=4, duplicates='drop').unique():
mask = (df['age'] >= age_q.left) & (df['age'] < age_q.right)
stratum_data = df[mask]
if (stratum_data['treatment'] == 0).sum() > 0 and (stratum_data['treatment'] == 1).sum() > 0:
treated_mean = stratum_data[stratum_data['treatment'] == 1]['salary'].mean()
control_mean = stratum_data[stratum_data['treatment'] == 0]['salary'].mean()
effect = treated_mean - control_mean
print(f" Age {age_q.left:.0f}-{age_q.right:.0f}: ${effect:.0f}")
# 8. Sensitivity Analysis
print(f"\n8. Sensitivity Analysis (Hidden Confounder Impact):")
# Vary hidden confounder correlation with outcome
for hidden_effect in [1000, 2000, 5000, 10000]:
adjusted_effect = regression_effect - hidden_effect * 0.1
print(f" If hidden confounder worth ${hidden_effect}: Effect = ${adjusted_effect:.0f}")
# 9. Summary Table
print(f"\n" + "="*60)
print("CAUSAL INFERENCE SUMMARY")
print("="*60)
print(f"True Treatment Effect: ${true_effect:,.0f}")
print(f"\nEstimates:")
print(f" Naive (BIASED): ${naive_effect:,.0f}")
print(f" Regression Adjustment: ${regression_effect:,.0f}")
print(f" Propensity Score Matching: ${psm_effect:,.0f}")
print(f" Stratification: ${stratified_effect:,.0f}")
print(f" Doubly Robust: ${dr_effect:,.0f}")
print("="*60)
# 10. Causal Graph (Text representation)
print(f"\n10. Causal Graph (DAG):")
print(f"""
Age → Treatment ← (Selection Bias)
↓ ↓
└─→ Salary
Interpretation:
- Age is a confounder
- Treatment causally affects Salary
- Age directly affects Salary
- Age affects probability of Treatment
""")
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 302 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 8624416b5876
Causal Inference is a skill published in the GitHub repository aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts (376 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 2,940 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Causal Inference compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Causal Inferenceaj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts | Skill | 376 | 8mo ago | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code, Codex |
| instrument-data-to-allotropeanthropics/knowledge-work-plugins | Skill | 35k | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 123 | Claude Code |
| exploratory-data-analysisK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 56k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 83 | Claude Code |
| matlabK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 56k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 44 | Claude Code |
| phylogeneticsK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 56k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 71 | Claude Code, Codex |
| research-engineerdavila7/claude-code-templates | Skill | 33k | yesterday | MIT | A | 43 | Claude Code, Codex |
| mapping-to-snomedmaziyarpanahi/openmed | Skill | 5.8k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 205 | Claude Code |