Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to akaghef/M3E. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/akaghef/M3E/main/.claude/skills/claude-codex-session-pack-20260214/skills/codex-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/akaghef/M3EWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/akaghef/m3e/codex-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/akaghef/m3e/codex-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akaghef/m3e/codex-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/akaghef/m3e/codex-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akaghef/m3e/codex-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00575 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00230 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00115 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
codex-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Codex Review Helper
codex review の実行と結果抽出を安定化するための skill。
使うべきとき
- 未コミット差分のレビューを毎回同じ手順で実行したい
codex reviewの生ログではなく、最終レビュー本文だけ読みたいsession id/ JSONL ログ探索を手作業でやりたくない
実行コマンド
未コミット差分レビュー
~/.claude/skills/codex-review/scripts/review-uncommitted.sh [--cd <dir>] [--model <model>] [--max-wait-seconds <seconds>] [--prompt "<追加指示>"]
例:
~/.claude/skills/codex-review/scripts/review-uncommitted.sh \
--cd /Users/hayatefukashiro/Desktop/product/Musubu \
--model gpt-5.3-codex \
--max-wait-seconds 1200 \
--prompt "Critical/Warningのみ。ファイルと行番号必須"
ベースブランチ差分レビュー
~/.claude/skills/codex-review/scripts/review-base.sh <base-branch> [--cd <dir>] [--model <model>] [--max-wait-seconds <seconds>] [--prompt "<追加指示>"]
出力仕様
- 標準出力は原則「最終レビュー本文のみ」
session idが取れない場合はcodex reviewの生出力へフォールバック- JSONL に
output_textが見つからない場合も生出力へフォールバック - 既定の最大待機時間は20分（
--max-wait-seconds 1200） - タイムアウト時はレビューを停止し、取得済みの部分結果を表示して終了（終了コード:
124）
注意
- ログ探索先は既定で
~/.codex/sessions - 必要なら
LOG_ROOT環境変数で上書き可能 codex review側制約により、--uncommitted/--base実行時の追加PROMPTは現状非対応（--promptは警告して無視）
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 53 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A aad19af20239
codex-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository akaghef/M3E (11 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 575 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
github-pr-workflow
Prepare a GitHub pull request from a feature branch — branch hygiene, commit shape, title/body, verification notes, screenshots for UI work, and replies to review comments.
review-delta
Review only changes since last commit using impact analysis. Token-efficient delta review with automatic blast-radius detection.
work-unit-commits
Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.
pr-pending-feedback
Evaluate pending (unsubmitted) review comments on the current branch's PR and, after user confirmation, address each in a separate sub-agent and separate commit.
github-contributor
A step-by-step guide for contributing code, tests, documentation, or build changes to open-source projects you do not maintain. It explains how to prepare a pull request that follows the project’s rules and is easier for maintainers to review.