Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to AkaraChen/aghub. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AkaraChen/aghub/main/.agents/skills/arrange/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AkaraChen/aghubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/akarachen/aghub/arrange)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/akarachen/aghub/arrange"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akarachen/aghub/arrange.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01566 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00783 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00313 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00157 |
Grade A, and why
arrange scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to arrange — 35 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 126 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Assess and improve layout and spacing that feels monotonous, crowded, or structurally weak — turning generic arrangements into intentional, rhythmic compositions.
MANDATORY PREPARATION
Invoke /frontend-design — it contains design principles, anti-patterns, and the Context Gathering Protocol. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no design context exists yet, you MUST run /teach-impeccable first.
Assess Current Layout
Analyze what's weak about the current spatial design:
-
Spacing:
- Is spacing consistent or arbitrary? (Random padding/margin values)
- Is all spacing the same? (Equal padding everywhere = no rhythm)
- Are related elements grouped tightly, with generous space between groups?
-
Visual hierarchy:
- Apply the squint test: blur your (metaphorical) eyes — can you still identify the most important element, second most important, and clear groupings?
- Is hierarchy achieved effectively? (Space and weight alone can be enough — but is the current approach working?)
- Does whitespace guide the eye to what matters?
-
Grid & structure:
- Is there a clear underlying structure, or does the layout feel random?
- Are identical card grids used everywhere? (Icon + heading + text, repeated endlessly)
- Is everything centered? (Left-aligned with asymmetric layouts feels more designed, but not a hard and fast rule)
-
Rhythm & variety:
- Does the layout have visual rhythm? (Alternating tight/generous spacing)
- Is every section structured the same way? (Monotonous repetition)
- Are there intentional moments of surprise or emphasis?
-
Density:
- Is the layout too cramped? (Not enough breathing room)
- Is the layout too sparse? (Excessive whitespace without purpose)
- Does density match the content type? (Data-dense UIs need tighter spacing; marketing pages need more air)
CRITICAL: Layout problems are often the root cause of interfaces feeling "off" even when colors and fonts are fine. Space is a design material — use it with intention.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 126 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 60a591349659
arrange is a skill published in the GitHub repository AkaraChen/aghub (266 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,566 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to arrange, differing in 35 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ijfw-ui-spec
Use when the user says: 'ui spec', 'design contract', 'ui audit setup', 'lock the design', 'visual contract', 'ui review setup', or '/ijfw-ui-spec'. Produces UI-SPEC.md as the visual design contract before any frontend or visual-artifact build, and dispatches ijfw-ui-auditor as the final 6-pillar gate.
ijfw-design
Use when the user says: 'design', 'redesign', 'UI', 'UX', 'dashboard', 'page', 'component', 'make it look better', 'polish', 'pretty', 'professional', 'user experience', 'layout', 'visual', 'accessibility', 'colors', 'typography', 'brand'.
design-maker
name: design-maker description: Used when the Design Brief is complete and the user needs to generate mockups. Reads Product-Spec.md and Design-Brief.md, then generates a complete set of design deliverables through a design tool MCP, including all pages, state variants, component specifications, design tokens…
Add Claude design-system and accessibility workflows with UX/UI Agent Skills
Use UX/UI Agent Skills when Claude should generate tokens, component specs, accessibility audits, and framework-specific UI code from a repeatable design workflow.
design-brief-builder
name: design-brief-builder description: Used when the user wants to define a design style or visual direction, or says something vague like 'I want a premium/sleek/modern look'. Guides the user through a design interview to clarify visual preferences and outputs Design-Brief.md. After Brief is saved, MUST run Next…
ui-designer
Designs and builds interface work on top of the design system the repo already has: layout, spacing, hierarchy, interaction states, and accessible defaults, with creativity calibrated to the surface instead of an unrequested redesign. Use when asked for a new screen, a redesign, empty, loading, and error states, or to…