Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to AkaraChen/aghub. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AkaraChen/aghub/main/.agents/skills/distill/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AkaraChen/aghubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/akarachen/aghub/distill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/akarachen/aghub/distill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akarachen/aghub/distill.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.01339 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00669 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00268 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
distill scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to distill — 34 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 130 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Remove unnecessary complexity from designs, revealing the essential elements and creating clarity through ruthless simplification.
MANDATORY PREPARATION
Invoke /frontend-design — it contains design principles, anti-patterns, and the Context Gathering Protocol. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no design context exists yet, you MUST run /teach-impeccable first.
Assess Current State
Analyze what makes the design feel complex or cluttered:
-
Identify complexity sources:
- Too many elements: Competing buttons, redundant information, visual clutter
- Excessive variation: Too many colors, fonts, sizes, styles without purpose
- Information overload: Everything visible at once, no progressive disclosure
- Visual noise: Unnecessary borders, shadows, backgrounds, decorations
- Confusing hierarchy: Unclear what matters most
- Feature creep: Too many options, actions, or paths forward
-
Find the essence:
- What's the primary user goal? (There should be ONE)
- What's actually necessary vs nice-to-have?
- What can be removed, hidden, or combined?
- What's the 20% that delivers 80% of value?
If any of these are unclear from the codebase, ask the user directly to clarify what you cannot infer.
CRITICAL: Simplicity is not about removing features - it's about removing obstacles between users and their goals. Every element should justify its existence.
Plan Simplification
Create a ruthless editing strategy:
- Core purpose: What's the ONE thing this should accomplish?
- Essential elements: What's truly necessary to achieve that purpose?
- Progressive disclosure: What can be hidden until needed?
- Consolidation opportunities: What can be combined or integrated?
IMPORTANT: Simplification is hard. It requires saying no to good ideas to make room for great execution. Be ruthless.
Simplify the Design
Systematically remove complexity across these dimensions:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 130 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A dcceecac4391
distill is a skill published in the GitHub repository AkaraChen/aghub (265 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 1,339 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to distill, differing in 34 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ijfw-ui-spec
Use when the user says: 'ui spec', 'design contract', 'ui audit setup', 'lock the design', 'visual contract', 'ui review setup', or '/ijfw-ui-spec'. Produces UI-SPEC.md as the visual design contract before any frontend or visual-artifact build, and dispatches ijfw-ui-auditor as the final 6-pillar gate.
ijfw-design
Use when the user says: 'design', 'redesign', 'UI', 'UX', 'dashboard', 'page', 'component', 'make it look better', 'polish', 'pretty', 'professional', 'user experience', 'layout', 'visual', 'accessibility', 'colors', 'typography', 'brand'.
design-maker
name: design-maker description: Used when the Design Brief is complete and the user needs to generate mockups. Reads Product-Spec.md and Design-Brief.md, then generates a complete set of design deliverables through a design tool MCP, including all pages, state variants, component specifications, design tokens…
Add Claude design-system and accessibility workflows with UX/UI Agent Skills
Use UX/UI Agent Skills when Claude should generate tokens, component specs, accessibility audits, and framework-specific UI code from a repeatable design workflow.
design-brief-builder
name: design-brief-builder description: Used when the user wants to define a design style or visual direction, or says something vague like 'I want a premium/sleek/modern look'. Guides the user through a design interview to clarify visual preferences and outputs Design-Brief.md. After Brief is saved, MUST run Next…
balise-handoff
Audits and prepares selected Figma screens, components, prototypes, and flows for developer handoff using explicit scope, source-of-truth mapping, evidence levels, risk-based gates, open-decision ownership, and acceptance criteria. Use when a design needs a Ready for dev review, implementation-readiness verdict…