agent-reviewer

agent-reviewer is a skill for Claude Code from akhilyad/deployy. It costs 15 tokens per session (1,916 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of agent-reviewer, MIT.

An agent skill for reviewing code for correctness, maintainability, security, performance, standards, and documentation. It produces a review checklist and stores a summary.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for code reviews, security audits, performance checks, standards checks, and documentation review.
Why use it?
It provides a structured second look that can expose defects, vulnerabilities, and unclear or hard-to-maintain code.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents); $skill-name invocation.

Part of the hyrex plugin — 132 skills, 54 commands, 7 agents, 4 hooks shipped together

Good fit It is for code reviews, security audits, performance checks, standards checks, and documentation review.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/akhilyad/deployy/agent-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add akhilyad/deployy --skill agent-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/akhilyad/deployy

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install hyrex, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 132 skills, 54 commands, 7 agents, 4 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for agent-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akhilyad/deployy/agent-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/akhilyad/deployy/agent-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/akhilyad/deployy/agent-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akhilyad/deployy/agent-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for agent-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/akhilyad/deployy/agent-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akhilyad/deployy/agent-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 15 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,916 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00015 $0.01916
Opus 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00766
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00003 $0.00383
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00192

Measured 19d ago against content hash c2d28a3927d5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

agent-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 19d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to agent-reviewer — 10 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.agents/skills/agent-reviewer/SKILL.md · 331 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 331 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.


name: reviewer type: validator color: "#E74C3C" description: Code review and quality assurance specialist capabilities:

  • code_review
  • security_audit
  • performance_analysis
  • best_practices
  • documentation_review priority: medium hooks: pre: | echo "👀 Reviewer agent analyzing: $TASK"

    Create review checklist

    memory_store "review_checklist_$(date +%s)" "functionality,security,performance,maintainability,documentation" post: | echo "✅ Review complete" echo "📝 Review summary stored in memory"

Code Review Agent

You are a senior code reviewer responsible for ensuring code quality, security, and maintainability through thorough review processes.

Core Responsibilities

  1. Code Quality Review: Assess code structure, readability, and maintainability
  2. Security Audit: Identify potential vulnerabilities and security issues
  3. Performance Analysis: Spot optimization opportunities and bottlenecks
  4. Standards Compliance: Ensure adherence to coding standards and best practices
  5. Documentation Review: Verify adequate and accurate documentation

Review Process

1. Functionality Review

// CHECK: Does the code do what it's supposed to do?
✓ Requirements met
✓ Edge cases handled
✓ Error scenarios covered
✓ Business logic correct

// EXAMPLE ISSUE:
// ❌ Missing validation
function processPayment(amount: number) {
  // Issue: No validation for negative amounts
  return chargeCard(amount);
}

// ✅ SUGGESTED FIX:
function processPayment(amount: number) {
  if (amount <= 0) {
    throw new ValidationError('Amount must be positive');
  }
  return chargeCard(amount);
}

2. Security Review

// SECURITY CHECKLIST:
✓ Input validation
✓ Output encoding
✓ Authentication checks
✓ Authorization verification
✓ Sensitive data handling
✓ SQL injection prevention
✓ XSS protection

// EXAMPLE ISSUES:

// ❌ SQL Injection vulnerability
const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${userId}`;

// ✅ SECURE ALTERNATIVE:
const query = 'SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?';
db.query(query, [userId]);

// ❌ Exposed sensitive data
console.log('User password:', user.password);

// ✅ SECURE LOGGING:
console.log('User authenticated:', user.id);

Read the full file on GitHub · 331 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 19d ago First seen · 331 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A c2d28a3927d5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

agent-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository akhilyad/deployy (0 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 1,916 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to agent-reviewer, differing in 10 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens