Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to akiojin/llmlb. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/akiojin/llmlb/develop/.gemini/skills/gwt-pr/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/akiojin/llmlbWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/akiojin/llmlb/gwt-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/akiojin/llmlb/gwt-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akiojin/llmlb/gwt-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/akiojin/llmlb/gwt-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akiojin/llmlb/gwt-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.04022 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.01609 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00804 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00402 |
Grade A, and why
gwt-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 325 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
GH PR
Overview
Create or update GitHub Pull Requests with the gh CLI using a detailed body template and strict same-branch rules.
Decision rules (must follow)
- Do not create or switch branches. Always use the current branch as the PR head.
- Only
developmay targetmain. If the base ismainand the head branch is anything other thandevelop, refuse to create the PR and instruct the user to merge intodevelopfirst, then create a release PR fromdevelop. - Check local working tree state before push/PR operations.
git status --porcelain- If output is non-empty (tracked or untracked changes), pause and ask the user what to do.
- Present 3 options: continue as-is, abort, or manual cleanup then rerun.
- Do not run
git stash,git commit, orgit cleanautomatically unless explicitly requested.
- Check for an existing PR for the current head branch.
gh pr list --head <head> --state all --json number,state,mergedAt,updatedAt,url,title,mergeCommit
- If no PR exists → create a new PR.
- If any PR exists and is NOT merged (
mergedAtis null) → push only and finish (do not create a new PR).- This applies to OPEN or CLOSED (unmerged) PRs.
- Only update title/body/labels if the user explicitly requests changes.
- If all PRs for the head are merged → check for post-merge commits (see below).
- If multiple PRs exist for the head → use the most recently updated PR for reporting, but the create vs push decision is based on
mergedAt.
Post-merge commit check (critical)
When all PRs for the head branch are merged, you must check whether there are new commits after the merge:
- Get the merge commit SHA of the most recent merged PR.
- Validate merge commit ancestry first:
git merge-base --is-ancestor <merge_commit> HEAD - If the merge commit is an ancestor of
HEAD, count commits after the merge:git rev-list --count <merge_commit>..HEAD
- If the merge commit is missing or not an ancestor of
HEAD, fallback to the branch upstream first:git rev-list --count origin/<head>..HEAD
- If the upstream comparison fails, fallback to the base branch comparison:
git rev-list --count origin/<base>..HEAD
- Decision:
- If the selected count is greater than 0 → create a new PR
- If the selected count is 0 → report "No new changes since merge" and finish
- If both fallback comparisons fail → stop and report
MANUAL CHECK
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 325 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A d8e92b10d61c
gwt-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository akiojin/llmlb (10 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 4,022 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-21.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr
Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.
merge-batch
Prepare and merge an owner-selected PR batch with contributor credit and exact-candidate admission. Use for a pasted PR list; combined focused validation is diagnostic, and every actual landing still requires its applicable checks and authorization.
otto-pr-review-loop
Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.
engram-branch-pr
PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.
github-contributor
A step-by-step guide for contributing code, tests, documentation, or build changes to open-source projects you do not maintain. It explains how to prepare a pull request that follows the project’s rules and is easier for maintainers to review.
revdiff
Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…