Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop --skill debrief-an-interview-loopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/debrief-an-interview-loop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/debrief-an-interview-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/debrief-an-interview-loop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/debrief-an-interview-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop/debrief-an-interview-loop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.01332 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00666 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00266 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00133 |
Grade A, and why
debrief-an-interview-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 75 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Debrief an Interview Loop
When to use
- Explicit: "synthesize {candidate}'s panel feedback", "hire or no-hire on {candidate}", "debrief the loop", "decision memo for {candidate}".
- Prerequisite: ≥2 interviewer feedback blocks exist (appended to loop file, pasted by user, or pulled via connected chat / collab tool).
- One invocation per candidate loop. Append - never overwrite - prior debriefs.
Connections I need
I run external work through Composio. Before this skill runs I check that the categories below are linked. Missing → I name the category, ask you to connect it from the Integrations tab, stop.
- Chat (Slack, Discord) — pull panel feedback from threads if your team writes it there. Optional.
- Docs (Notion) — read scorecards or feedback pages. Optional.
- Project tracking (Linear) — pull feedback if it's tracked as tickets. Optional.
- Inbox (Loops or Gmail) — read panelist feedback emails. Optional.
If none of these are connected and the loop file has no feedback blocks I ask you to paste the feedback before I synthesize.
Information I need
I read your people context first. For every required field that's missing I ask ONE plain-language question (best modality: connected app > file drop > URL > paste) and wait.
- Candidate loop record — Required. Why I need it: I synthesize against the prep brief and the panel structure. If missing I ask: "I don't have a loop on file for this candidate. Was the loop scheduled here, or somewhere else?"
- Panelist feedback — Required. Why I need it: synthesis without feedback is fiction. If missing I ask: "Where's the panel feedback? I can pull it from Slack, Notion, or Linear, or you can paste it here."
- Role rubric — Required. Why I need it: I score the loop against your must-haves. If missing I ask: "What role and level is this candidate for, and what are your top three must-haves?"
- Leveling framework — Required. Why I need it: hire / no-hire bands map to your bar at this level. If missing I ask: "How would you describe what 'meeting the bar' looks like at this level?"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 75 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A a423ea6bf3d4
debrief-an-interview-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository akiotanaka847/qaio-desktop (2 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,332 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
connecting-with-people
Applies advanced interpersonal techniques for building genuine, lasting connections in entrepreneurial contexts. Covers the power of validation as the deepest form of listening, leading with 'How can I help you?' as a first-meeting strategy, maintaining authentic online identity, vulnerability as a professional…
inspiring-and-retaining
Equips founders with practical retention and inspiration techniques grounded in selfless leadership, strategic kindness, and relationship maintenance at scale. Covers making it about the audience (not you), the random-act-of-kindness mood reset, the homelessness perspective technique, praise-to-criticism ratios…
influencing-and-persuading
Provides founders with Socratic influence techniques, confidence projection methods, and patience-based persuasion strategies for converting stakeholders without overt selling. Covers idea-seeding (making others believe your idea is theirs), the paradox of persuasion (listening as the primary influence tool)…
meeting-the-right-people
Applies modern networking and relationship-curation methods for entrepreneurs who need to build strategic networks efficiently. Covers standing out through signature differentiation, the warm-introduction chain for reaching anyone, building a personal advisory board, the discipline of hiring slow and firing fast in…
reading-people
Applies practical techniques for decoding what people actually mean beyond their words, through nonverbal communication, active listening, rapport micro-signals, bluff detection, and mirroring. Covers listening with eyes rather than ears, the 55/38/7 communication model, accepting rapport signals, reading dishonesty…
resolving-people-conflict
Delivers specific behavioural systems for resolving interpersonal conflict in real time -- reframing conflict as a helping stance, the 24-hour cooling rule, strategic surrender of what cannot be controlled, and the bulletproof vest protocol (a structured seven-step system for safe conflict resolution). Use when a…