Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/alaliqing/claude-paper/summarynpx skills add alaliqing/claude-paper --skill summarygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alaliqing/claude-paperWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alaliqing/claude-paper/summary)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alaliqing/claude-paper/summary"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alaliqing/claude-paper/summary.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00048 | $0.02031 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01015 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00406 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00203 |
Grade A, and why
summary scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to claude-paper-summary — 36 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 263 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Quick Paper Summary Workflow
This skill generates a concise summary of a research paper's core ideas and key points.
When to use:
- You want to quickly understand what a paper is about
- You need the main contributions without deep technical details
- You're screening papers to decide which to study in depth
When NOT to use:
- You want comprehensive study materials (use
/claude-paper:studyinstead) - You need code demonstrations
- You want interactive visualizations
Language Detection: Detect the user's language from their input and generate ALL materials in that language.
- Example: User says "我们学习一下这篇论文" → Generate materials in Chinese
- Example: User says "Let's study this paper" → Generate materials in English
Step 0: Check Dependencies (First Run Only)
if [ ! -f "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/.installed" ]; then
echo "First run - installing dependencies..."
cd "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}"
npm install || exit 1
# Install Python dependencies for image extraction
python3 -m pip install pymupdf --user 2>/dev/null || pip3 install pymupdf --user 2>/dev/null || echo "Warning: Failed to install pymupdf"
touch "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/.installed"
echo "Dependencies installed!"
fi
Step 1: Download and Parse PDF
Supports multiple input formats:
- Local path:
~/Downloads/paper.pdf - Direct PDF URL:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.03762.pdf - arXiv URL:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762
Step 1a: Check input type and download if URL
USER_INPUT="<user-input>"
# Check if input is a URL (starts with http:// or https://)
if [[ "$USER_INPUT" =~ ^https?:// ]]; then
# Download PDF from URL
INPUT_PATH=$(node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/study/scripts/download-pdf.cjs "$USER_INPUT")
else
# Use local path directly
INPUT_PATH="$USER_INPUT"
fi
For URLs, the download script will:
- Download PDFs to
/tmp/claude-paper-downloads/ - Convert arXiv
/abs/URLs to PDF URLs automatically - Validate that URLs point to PDF files
- Return the local file path for processing
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 263 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A e0fbee3e3cf4
summary is a skill published in the GitHub repository alaliqing/claude-paper (334 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 2,031 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to claude-paper-summary, differing in 36 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
peer-review
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating…
scientific-critical-thinking
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review…
scientific-schematics
Create publication-quality scientific diagrams using Nano Banana 2 AI with smart iterative refinement. Uses Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for quality review. Only regenerates if quality is below threshold for your document type. Specialized in neural network architectures, system diagrams, flowcharts, biological pathways…
hypothesis-generation
Structured hypothesis formulation from observations. Use when you have experimental observations or data and need to formulate testable hypotheses with predictions, propose mechanisms, and design experiments to test them. Follows scientific method framework. For open-ended ideation use scientific-brainstorming; for…
tooluniverse-organic-chemistry
Organic chemistry reasoning guide for reaction product prediction, mechanism analysis (electrophilic/nucleophilic substitution, addition, elimination, pericyclic, radical), and spectroscopy interpretation (1H/13C NMR, IR, MS). Reasons from first principles (electron flow, kinetic vs thermodynamic) rather than…
scientific-brainstorming
Creative research ideation and exploration. Use for open-ended brainstorming sessions, exploring interdisciplinary connections, challenging assumptions, or identifying research gaps. Best for early-stage research planning when you do not have specific observations yet. For formulating testable hypotheses from data use…