Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add alebgl77/claude-inc --skill pipeline-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alebgl77/claude-incWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alebgl77/claude-inc/pipeline-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alebgl77/claude-inc/pipeline-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alebgl77/claude-inc/pipeline-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alebgl77/claude-inc/pipeline-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alebgl77/claude-inc/pipeline-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.00685 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00342 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00137 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
pipeline-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 53 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pipeline Review — Pipeline Doctor
"Pipeline truth over pipeline comfort."
When to use
- "Review my pipeline" (paste/attach deals: name, value, stage, last contact, next step)
- "What should I focus on this week?"
- "My forecast feels fake"
- Weekly ritual; also before any forecast conversation
- Works from a CSV, a markdown table, or messy notes — it will structure them first
Workflow
- Normalise the data into: deal, value, stage, last meaningful contact, next step (dated?), single or multi-threaded.
- Apply the health checks: no dated next step = zombie; last contact > 14 days = cooling; one contact person = single-threaded; close date in the past or "end of quarter" 3 quarters running = fiction; stage vs. evidence mismatch (e.g. "negotiation" but no proposal sent).
- Score priorities: value × probability × momentum. Big-but-dead loses to small-but-moving.
- Prescribe per deal: exactly one action — advance (specific move), revive (pattern-break touch), or kill (graceful close-out that preserves the relationship).
- Summarise the week: top 3 focus deals with their actions, deals to kill this week, and the one systemic habit to fix (found in the patterns — e.g. "you never set next steps on first calls").
- Forecast sanity line: weighted realistic total vs. optimistic total, in one sentence.
Output format
## Pipeline review — {date} · {n} deals · realistic: {€X} (optimistic: {€Y})
| Deal | Value | Health | Diagnosis | THE action this week |
|------|-------|--------|-----------|----------------------|
| ... | ... | 🟢🟡🔴 | ... | ... |
**Focus 3**: 1. {deal} → {action} 2. ... 3. ...
**Kill list**: {deals} — with the close-out line to send
**Systemic fix**: {the one habit}
Quality bar
- Every deal gets exactly one action, none gets "keep monitoring"
- Zombies named and killed out loud, with a graceful exit message
- Single-threaded deals flagged with a second-contact suggestion
- Realistic vs. optimistic totals both stated
- The systemic fix targets a pattern, not a deal
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 53 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A 697ae3c5ec50
pipeline-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository alebgl77/claude-inc (15 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 685 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
atelier-setup
Configure a repository for Atelier's development workflow. Use only when explicitly invoked; inspect existing guidance, issue-tracker and domain-document conventions, preview the proposed configuration, and write only after approval. It does not install Atelier or initialize external tooling.
simplify-code
Parallel 4-agent cleanup of recent code changes.
google-workspace
Gmail, Calendar, Drive, Docs, Sheets via gws CLI or Python.
box
Box manages cloud files, sharing, search, and metadata.
ima-skill
A unified IMA skill for managing personal notes and knowledge bases through the platform's APIs.
notes
A note-management skill for searching, reading, creating, and adding content to personal notes in IMA, a note and knowledge platform.