Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AleksandarBisevac/claude-plugins --skill reproducing-ci-locallygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AleksandarBisevac/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aleksandarbisevac/claude-plugins/reproducing-ci-locally)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aleksandarbisevac/claude-plugins/reproducing-ci-locally"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aleksandarbisevac/claude-plugins/reproducing-ci-locally/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aleksandarbisevac/claude-plugins/reproducing-ci-locally"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aleksandarbisevac/claude-plugins/reproducing-ci-locally.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00130 | $0.02155 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00065 | $0.01077 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00431 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00215 |
Grade A, and why
reproducing-ci-locally scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 203 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Reproducing CI Locally
A local check is only useful if it runs the same thing the runner runs. Most "green locally, red in CI" failures are not bugs in the code — they are a difference between two commands: different paths, different test markers, different env, a different linter version, or a different interpreter.
The fix is mechanical: derive the local command from the workflow file, not from the Makefile, not from habit, not from what the last repo used.
Read the workflow before you run anything
The workflow is the contract. The Makefile is a convenience that drifts from it.
# What the gate actually is, in order
sed -n '/jobs:/,$p' .github/workflows/ci.yml
# Every command CI runs, across all workflows
grep -rn "run:" .github/workflows/
Copy out four things, verbatim:
- The commands and their order.
- The paths each command is scoped to (
ruff check app tests scriptsis notruff check .). - Test selection — marker expressions,
-kfilters, which suites are excluded. - The
env:block, and the runtime/toolchain versions insetup-*steps.
Each of those four is a distinct way to get a wrong answer locally.
Paths. If CI lints app tests scripts and you run ruff check ., you get
findings from directories CI never looks at — a red that isn't a merge blocker
and shouldn't be "fixed" in an unrelated PR. Run it the narrow way to reproduce
the gate; run it the wide way only when you're deliberately auditing.
Markers. A suite-wide make test that excludes one marker is not the CI
gate if CI excludes six. Live-credential integration tests deselected in CI will
run locally, hit a fake key, and fail in a way that looks like a regression:
# Wrong: local shorthand — pulls in suites CI never runs
pytest -m "not browser"
# Right: the full expression, copied from the workflow
pytest -m "not browser and not slow and not load and not integration"
Env. Config objects instantiated at import time (a settings singleton at
module scope, an engine built when the module loads) make collection fail
without the workflow's variables — a wall of "Field required" errors that looks
like a broken suite. Mirror the env: block, including the shape of values:
if CI passes a Postgres URL and the module builds a pooled engine, a local
SQLite URL raises on arguments that dialect rejects before a single test runs.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 203 lines · 130 tokens per session scan A 6789fc8ca806
reproducing-ci-locally is a skill published in the GitHub repository AleksandarBisevac/claude-plugins (4 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 130 tokens to every session and 2,155 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
party
Throw or join an agents-party: a shared channel where several AI agent sessions (and their humans) talk to each other — Claude Code, Cursor, Codex or any other agent, on one machine or across machines. Use when the user asks to throw or start a party, wants several agent sessions to collaborate in one chat, wants two…
verify
The profile-parameterized static-validation + test executor (/foundry:verify, SDLC steps 7 & 8). Resolves the ACTIVE stack profile from .foundry/stack-profile.lock (via the merged stack-profile loader's resolvelock) and dispatches the profile-declared staticvalidation (format/lint/typecheck/build) + testrecipe…
cicd
This skill should be used when the user mentions keywords related to cicd.
aw-author
Author, validate, and improve GitHub Agentic Workflow (gh-aw) markdown files. Use when the user wants to create a new workflow, validate an existing workflow, improve a workflow, or debug workflow issues. Triggers on: "aw-author", "agentic workflow", "gh-aw workflow", "workflow markdown", "workflow frontmatter"…
cicd-gitops-pipeline
Skill "cicd-gitops-pipeline" from lukasrepublic/agentic-foundry, covering when to trigger, the pipeline shape (six parts, one contract), both build origins, one downstream contract and anti-patterns.
scaffold
Bootstrap a new project with your stack, auth, database, and standards pre-configured.