Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AleksandarBisevac/claude-plugins --skill verifying-external-behaviorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AleksandarBisevac/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aleksandarbisevac/claude-plugins/verifying-external-behavior)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aleksandarbisevac/claude-plugins/verifying-external-behavior"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aleksandarbisevac/claude-plugins/verifying-external-behavior/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aleksandarbisevac/claude-plugins/verifying-external-behavior"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aleksandarbisevac/claude-plugins/verifying-external-behavior.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00138 | $0.02229 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00069 | $0.01115 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00446 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00223 |
Grade A, and why
verifying-external-behavior scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' https://api.example.com/v1/things How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 202 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verifying External Behavior
Most integration bugs are not coding errors. They are a belief about someone else's system — a status code, a parameter name, a response shape, a build backend's scoping rule — that was never checked and turned out to be wrong. The code is written correctly against a contract that does not exist.
The fix is not more care. It is a probe: a throwaway command that asks the real system the exact question, before the code is written. Probes cost seconds. The bugs they prevent are silent, ship green, and are found months later.
Probe the exact call you are about to write
Not a similar call, not the documented example — the same endpoint form, the same library version, the same argument spelling.
# A library's real defaults / return shapes, with no venv to create or clean up
uv run --no-project --with somelib python -c "import somelib; print(somelib.Thing())"
# The exact URL, including the collection-vs-item distinction
curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' https://api.example.com/v1/things
curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' https://api.example.com/v1/things/1
# What a build backend actually put in the artifact
uv build && unzip -l dist/*.whl
# A real service instead of a fake, for one minute
docker run --rm -p 6390:6379 redis:7-alpine
Two rules make probes worth the minute they cost:
- Probe before you design around the answer. A probe that confirms a parameter tweak "should" fix a discrepancy is worth more than the tweak.
- Paste the probe command and its output into the PR, comment, or test. A finding with no reproduction decays into folklore, and the next person re-derives it — or, worse, trusts it after it has gone stale.
Permissive clients don't reject wrong arguments — they ignore them
This is the highest-severity class, because the failure returns plausible data.
Many HTTP client wrappers forward keyword arguments verbatim into the query
string without validating them against their own documented parameter list. The
remote service then drops the unknown parameter and applies its default — often
"the authenticated user". A misspelled selector (owner= for owner_screen_name=,
id_= for id=) does not raise; it silently returns someone else's records.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 202 lines · 138 tokens per session scan A 1461f335e39c
verifying-external-behavior is a skill published in the GitHub repository AleksandarBisevac/claude-plugins (4 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 138 tokens to every session and 2,229 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
error-handling-patterns
Master error handling patterns across languages including exceptions, Result types, error propagation, and graceful degradation to build resilient applications. Use when implementing error handling, designing APIs, or improving application reliability.
tidewave-integration
Tidewave MCP runtime tools — debugging, smoke testing, live state inspection, SQL queries, hex docs. Use when evaluating code in a running Phoenix app.
perf
Analyze Elixir/Phoenix performance — N+1 queries, assign bloat, ecto optimization, genserver bottlenecks. Use when slowness, timeouts, or high memory reported.
data-fetching
Use when implementing or debugging ANY network request, API call, or data fetching. Covers fetch API, axios, React Query, SWR, error handling, caching strategies, offline support.
health-check
Runs plugin health checks (venv packages, skill registration, and album slug collisions). Use when the user asks to check plugin health, verify setup, or troubleshoot missing skills.
api-error-handling
Implements standardized API error responses with proper status codes, logging, and user-friendly messages. Use when building production APIs, implementing error recovery patterns, or integrating error monitoring services.