Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aleksbuss/orchestra --skill security-and-hardeninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aleksbuss/orchestraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aleksbuss/orchestra/security-and-hardening)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aleksbuss/orchestra/security-and-hardening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aleksbuss/orchestra/security-and-hardening/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aleksbuss/orchestra/security-and-hardening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aleksbuss/orchestra/security-and-hardening.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.04450 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.02225 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00890 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00445 |
Grade B, and why
security-and-hardening scanned grade B with 3 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Cloud metadata endpointmediumServer-side request forgery
One request to 169.254.169.254 can return temporary IAM credentials.
The `range() !== 'unicast'` check covers loopback, link-local `169.254.169.254` (cloud metadata, the #1 SSRF target), private, and unique-local ranges across IPv4 and IPv6. Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Unrestricted tool accesslowExcessive agency
A wildcard tool grant or "run any command" leaves no least-privilege boundary at all.
- **Be wary of `postinstall` scripts** in unfamiliar packages — they run arbitrary code at install time. Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
await fetch(req.body.webhookUrl); This is a copy
92% identical to security-hardening — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 462 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Security and Hardening
Overview
Security-first development practices for web applications. Treat every external input as hostile, every secret as sacred, and every authorization check as mandatory. Security isn't a phase — it's a constraint on every line of code that touches user data, authentication, or external systems.
When to Use
- Building anything that accepts user input
- Implementing authentication or authorization
- Storing or transmitting sensitive data
- Integrating with external APIs or services
- Adding file uploads, webhooks, or callbacks
- Handling payment or PII data
Process: Threat Model First
Controls bolted on without a threat model are guesses. Before hardening, spend five minutes thinking like an attacker:
- Map the trust boundaries. Where does untrusted data cross into your system? HTTP requests, form fields, file uploads, webhooks, third-party APIs, message queues, and LLM output. Every boundary is attack surface.
- Name the assets. What's worth stealing or breaking? Credentials, PII, payment data, admin actions, money movement.
- Run STRIDE over each boundary — a quick lens, not a ceremony:
| Threat | Ask | Typical mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Spoofing | Can someone impersonate a user/service? | Authentication, signature verification |
| Tampering | Can data be altered in transit or at rest? | Integrity checks, parameterized queries, HTTPS |
| Repudiation | Can an action be denied later? | Audit logging of security events |
| Information disclosure | Can data leak? | Encryption, field allowlists, generic errors |
| Denial of service | Can it be overwhelmed? | Rate limiting, input size caps, timeouts |
| Elevation of privilege | Can a user gain rights they shouldn't? | Authorization checks, least privilege |
- Write abuse cases next to use cases. For each feature, ask "how would I misuse this?" — then make that your first test.
If you can't name the trust boundaries for a feature, you're not ready to secure it. This is OWASP A04: Insecure Design — most breaches begin in design, not code.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 462 lines · 48 tokens per session scan B 8fed058a5202
security-and-hardening is a skill published in the GitHub repository aleksbuss/orchestra (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 4,450 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 3 findings (cloud metadata endpoint, unrestricted tool access, makes network calls). It is 92% identical to security-hardening, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
data-analysis
A careful workflow for working with table-like files such as CSV, Excel, TSV, JSON, and Parquet. It requires inspecting the data before writing small analysis steps, then checking each result.
deep-research
Use this skill for any task that requires in-depth research, investigation, or comprehensive report generation on a topic. This includes: producing industry analysis, market research, technology surveys, competitive intelligence, trend reports, or any deliverable that synthesizes information from multiple sources into…
ama-memory
Use AMA memory in OpenClaw to recall prior context, capture turns, inspect stored state, end sessions, or delete a user's memory when asked.
cg-work-memory
Use when a local agent needs to submit a concise public work-memory report for its own completed local task through cg report work-memory.
comm-agent-skill
Communication specialist for the OpenClaw multi-agent system. Use this skill when the task involves: drafting or sending emails, posting to Discord or other chat platforms, scheduling calendar events, sending notifications, or any outbound communication on behalf of the user. Always drafts before sending and requires…
data-agent-skill
Data processing and analysis specialist for the OpenClaw multi-agent system. Use this skill when the task involves: parsing CSV/JSON/Excel files, data cleaning and transformation, SQL queries, statistical analysis, generating charts or visualizations, aggregating data from multiple sources, or extracting insights from…