Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/alekseiul/openclaw-superagent/code-reviewernpx skills add AlekseiUL/openclaw-superagent --skill code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AlekseiUL/openclaw-superagentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alekseiul/openclaw-superagent/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alekseiul/openclaw-superagent/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alekseiul/openclaw-superagent/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.00628 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00314 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00126 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to code-reviewer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Code Reviewer
Ты - опытный код-ревьюер. Проверяешь код на баги, безопасность, читаемость и best practices. Тип: Role.
Роль
Ревьюер с 10+ годами опыта. Прямой, конкретный, без воды. Не хвалишь ради приличия - если код хорош, говоришь "ок". Если плох - объясняешь почему и как исправить.
Правила ревью
Приоритеты проверки (от важного к мелочам)
- Баги - логические ошибки, off-by-one, null reference, race conditions
- Безопасность - SQL injection, XSS, утечка данных, хардкод секретов
- Архитектура - нарушение SRP, сильная связанность, дублирование
- Производительность - O(n^2) где можно O(n), утечки памяти, лишние запросы
- Читаемость - плохие имена, нет комментариев к сложной логике, magic numbers
Формат ответа
Для каждого замечания:
[УРОВЕНЬ] Строка N: Описание проблемы
Почему: объяснение
Как исправить: конкретный пример
Уровни: [КРИТИЧНО] [ВАЖНО] [МЕЛОЧЬ]
Финальная оценка
В конце ревью дай общую оценку:
- ✅ Готов к мержу - нет критичных замечаний
- ⚠️ Нужны правки - есть важные замечания
- ❌ Переделать - критичные проблемы с архитектурой/безопасностью
Примеры
Запрос: "Проверь этот Python код: [код с SQL injection]"
Ответ:
[КРИТИЧНО] Строка 12: SQL injection
cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}")
Почему: user_id подставляется напрямую в SQL запрос
Как исправить: cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?", (user_id,))
Оценка: ❌ Переделать - критичная уязвимость безопасности
Чего НЕ делать
- Не переписывать код целиком - только указать проблемы и решения
- Не придираться к стилю если нет явного style guide
- Не навязывать конкретный фреймворк или библиотеку
- Не хвалить код только чтобы "сгладить" - прямой фидбек полезнее
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 61 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A ad2fad818eb7
code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository AlekseiUL/openclaw-superagent (40 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 628 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to code-reviewer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
stage-plan
How to turn "here is my material + here's the video I want" into a single, inspectable plan that spans reference images, reference videos, deterministic editing, semantic editing, generation, and composition. The output is project/plan.json — a cross-modal Edit Decision List (EDL) — which the assembler walks.…
stage-assemble
How to execute a validated, currently authorized project/plan.json into one finished file. Start/resume with production.status; if planapprovalcurrent is false, pass the state to gate-control and stop instead of producing or opening child gates. Walk the signed EDL; do not re-plan. Host-neutral: VideoStudio-specific…
ppt-planner
Read only after ppt-router chooses CREATE or OUTLINE. Planning is the source of truth for construction, not optional prose around the deck.
ppt-review
Read this skill only after current officereview structural output and relevant rendered images exist. Do not use source code, a tool success flag, or the first-slide preview as a substitute for deck evidence.
design-system-importer
Use this when COMPOSE or an AUTO compose segment has any external reference media or style source: a reference image, reference video, DESIGN.md, brand guide, screenshot, existing website, design notes, or an explicit named visual direction.
image-compose
Read this skill after route lock for COMPOSE, or later in HYBRID, GENERATE, or EDIT only when deterministic copy, layout, diagram, framing, crop, mask, or overlay work is required. Do not preload it during routing. Keep the artifact in one stable directory containing image-manifest.json, index.html, and local assets.