verify-project

verify-project is a skill for Claude Code from alessio-locatelli/ceo-agent-workflow. It costs 8 tokens per session (2,143 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A project setup checker for the CEO Agent Workflow, a system that uses AI agents to help run company tasks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after running the project's setup script and before starting a CEO session. It runs automated checks and reviews files such as the company state, team details, budget, and runway.
Why use it?
It finds missing or incomplete configuration before the workflow is used, reducing failures caused by incorrect company, team, budget, or project files.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions Claude Code.

Needs its repository: it runs a file that does not travel with it, so clone the repository first. The line is bash .claude/scripts/verify-project-automated.sh.

Good fit Use it after running the project's setup script and before starting a CEO session. It runs automated checks and reviews files such as the company state, team details, budget, and runway.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alessio-locatelli/ceo-agent-workflow
agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/alessio-locatelli/ceo-agent-workflow/verify-project

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for verify-project

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alessio-locatelli/ceo-agent-workflow/verify-project/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alessio-locatelli/ceo-agent-workflow/verify-project)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alessio-locatelli/ceo-agent-workflow/verify-project"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alessio-locatelli/ceo-agent-workflow/verify-project/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for verify-project

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alessio-locatelli/ceo-agent-workflow/verify-project"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alessio-locatelli/ceo-agent-workflow/verify-project.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 8 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,143 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00008 $0.02143
Opus 5 $0.00004 $0.01071
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00429
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00214

Measured 10d ago against content hash 7e82679b1139, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

verify-project scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

src/templates/_claude/skills/verify-project/SKILL.md · 296 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 296 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Verify Project Setup

You are performing a comprehensive validation of the CEO Agent Workflow project setup. This verification ensures the user has properly configured the system after running init_startup.sh and before running /company/run-ceo.

Validation Process

Phase 1: Automated Checks

Run the automated validation script:

bash .claude/scripts/verify-project-automated.sh

Record the results and any errors/warnings from the automated script.

Phase 2: Semantic Configuration Review

Thoroughly review each configuration file for completeness and coherence:

1. COMPANY_STATE.md Validation

Read vault/COMPANY_STATE.md and verify:

Mission & Vision

  • Company mission is specific and actionable (not generic)
  • Vision statement is clear and measurable
  • Industry/market is clearly defined

Team Section

  • At least one founder/employee is listed with real name
  • Roles are specific (not just "Founder" but "Founder, CEO" or "Founder, CTO")
  • If advisors are listed, they have specific expertise areas

Budget & Runway

  • Total budget is a realistic number (not exactly $10,000)
  • Burn rate makes sense for team size
  • Runway calculation is correct: (Total Budget - Spent) / Burn Rate
  • Cash allocation percentages add up to 100%

Product Status

  • Current stage matches the specs in vault/specs directory
  • Tech stack is specific (not "TBD" or "Various")
  • If MVP is claimed, there should be corresponding deployment info

Quarterly OKRs

  • Objectives are specific to this business (not generic template text)
  • Each objective has 2-3 measurable key results
  • Key results have specific numbers/dates
  • No placeholder dates like "2024-01-15" or "End of Q1"
Avoid XY Problems, Wishful Thinking, and Unsupported Statements
  • Provide justification or references for important statements. Bad: “Framework X is slow.” Better: “Framework X is slow because …” (include a clear reason or evidence). Bad: “Tool X is not suitable.” Better: “In my opinion/personal experience, Tool X is not suitable.” (emphasize that this is a personal judgment rather than an absolute fact).

Read the full file on GitHub · 296 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 296 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 7e82679b1139

Subscribe to this mod's changes

verify-project is a skill published in the GitHub repository alessio-locatelli/ceo-agent-workflow (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 2,143 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.