fix-with-pingfusi

fix-with-pingfusi is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from alex-durango/pingfusi. It costs 78 tokens per session (1,132 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review loop for checking a website draft against its original site, finding visual differences, and correcting them in the draft's own source.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review, polish, rebuild, publish, and repeat checks on a website draft until the review gives an approving result.
Why use it?
It helps finish and verify clones made with different website builders or by hand, especially when the last details still do not match.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review, polish, rebuild, publish, and repeat checks on a website draft until the review gives an approving result.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/alex-durango/pingfusi/fix-with-pingfusi
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add alex-durango/pingfusi --skill fix-with-pingfusi
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alex-durango/pingfusi

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for fix-with-pingfusi

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alex-durango/pingfusi/fix-with-pingfusi/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alex-durango/pingfusi/fix-with-pingfusi)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alex-durango/pingfusi/fix-with-pingfusi"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alex-durango/pingfusi/fix-with-pingfusi/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for fix-with-pingfusi

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alex-durango/pingfusi/fix-with-pingfusi"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alex-durango/pingfusi/fix-with-pingfusi.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 78 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,132 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00078 $0.01132
Opus 5 $0.00039 $0.00566
Sonnet 5 $0.00016 $0.00226
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00113

Measured 9d ago against content hash 56dde921d725, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

fix-with-pingfusi scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skill/fix-with-pingfusi/SKILL.md · 69 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Fix a draft with pingfusi (the review loop)

The draft is the user's CURRENT project (or a directory/URL they name). Any builder's output works — pingfusi runs the loop that closes the last 10%: the draft is reviewed side-by-side with the original, pins come back on what's off, you fix them in the draft's own source, repeat until an approving verdict.

Steps

  1. Preflight: pingfusi doctor (surface failures). Identify the ORIGINAL url — ask the user if it isn't obvious from the project (README, comments, git remote).

  2. Build the draft: run its production build and identify a self-contained output directory (dist/, build/, out/, or equivalent). A running dev server is useful for editing, but it is not the preferred reviewer URL.

  3. Register: pingfusi adopt <name> <original-url> (name = short slug). This is the reviewer-loop-only path — no pixel gates, the review verdict is the check.

  4. Publish through Pingfusi hosting by default:

    pingfusi publish <built-dir> --target <name> --name <name>-review
    

    This records the immutable hosted URL where pingfusi review already looks for it. Rebuild and publish again after each change. Use pingfusi tunnel <name> --url http://localhost:<port> only when the production app genuinely requires a live server (SSR, server actions, API routes, or authentication) and cannot produce a self-contained build. Never choose a tunnel merely because a dev server is already running.

  5. The loop: pingfusi review <name> file [--region "…"] [--context "one line: what this site/page is"] [--results 1..20] → tell the user the round is filed with an independent human reviewer on the pingfusi service (the reviewer pins what's wrong + picks a verdict — the user does not review). The filing command automatically chains client-safe wait legs until feedback. If a raw MCP leg returns pending, immediately call pingfusi_wait again; never return pending to the user or file a duplicate. Passive result/verify reads do not renew the lease (a lapse only pulls the round from the feed for new claims; a reviewer mid-review can still finish). On each verdict:

    • Approved → done; report with the round history.
    • Pins → fix each in the DRAFT'S OWN source (its components/styles — match its idioms; derive fixes from the original site's real markup/CSS, never invent), rebuild and publish a new immutable hosted draft (or, for the exceptional live-server path, run pingfusi tunnel <name> --check), refile with --changelog "what changed since your last review"; that refile owns its wait. Repeat — the run is not complete until an approving verdict is recorded. Full rounds default to 1 result; request 5 for a broader read and 15–20 only for complex work or when higher confidence is worth it. Each completed result costs 1 credit; undelivered results are not charged.
    • If a pin is temporal (timing, easing, spring, stagger, scroll/pointer-driven, canvas, or WebGL motion), run pingfusi next <name> and follow its pingfusi motion … machine route (first-draft doctrine: the draft build reproduces animations automatically; motion checks are build receipts and warnings — never gates, never review rounds). Fix with the routed utility — motion pass to re-run the build pass, verify-introspected for the exact engine-declaration diff, or the sampled chain sampleapply-sampledverify-sampled — then redeploy and refile the page round. Motion never blocks filing or refiling; the reviewer's side-by-side look IS the motion review.
  6. Rules: all review contact through pingfusi review <name> … (never any MCP directly); polls one-sided only — a poll is text-only and the reviewer sees no page, so it may only ask what the ORIGINAL site does, described in words; never ask a poll to compare, judge, or look at anything (that is the review round's job); never submit or open a review yourself; screenshots for triage, never as proof of a match. No login? Stop and have the user run pingfusi setup — review rounds require it; there is no offline review path. If anything else blocks a round, stop and tell the user what failed.

Read the full file on GitHub · 69 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 69 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A 56dde921d725

Subscribe to this mod's changes

fix-with-pingfusi is a skill published in the GitHub repository alex-durango/pingfusi (110 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 1,132 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

web-prototype

General-purpose desktop web prototype. Single self-contained HTML file built by copying the seed assets/template.html and pasting section layouts from references/layouts.md. Default for any landing / marketing / docs / SaaS page when no more specific skill matches.

nexu-io/open-design · 59 tokens

web-prototype-taste-brutalist

Swiss industrial-print web prototype. Newsprint canvas, monolithic black grotesque, viewport-bleeding numerals, hairline grid dividers, hazard-red accent, ASCII syntax decoration. Distilled from Leonxlnx/taste-skill brutalist-skill (Swiss Industrial Print mode).

nexu-io/open-design · 70 tokens

frontend-design

Guidance for distinctive, intentional visual design when building new UI or reshaping an existing one. Use whenever the task produces or modifies anything a user will see rendered — websites, landing pages, web apps, dashboards, React/HTML/Vue components, artifacts with visual output, style overhauls, or "make this…

XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code · 111 tokens

frontend-design

Produce intentional, responsive, accessible UI work and perform visual QA instead of generic component assembly.

Hmbown/CodeWhale · 21 tokens

image-to-code

Implement a selected image, screenshot, mockup, generated concept, or design frame as a faithful, responsive, interactive frontend in the target codebase.

XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code · 34 tokens

frontend

MUST USE for frontend/web UI/UX/visual work: building, styling, redesigning pages/components, React setup, performance audits, visual QA, taste, and polish. Routes four rulesets: design taste router and brand references; perfection for Playwright/Chromium Lighthouse/Core Web Vitals; ui-ux-db palettes/fonts/guidelines…

code-yeongyu/lazycodex · 183 tokens